Do not rely on x flag #80
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tobiasgrosser
force-pushed
the
do_not_rely_on_x_flag
branch
2 times, most recently
from
38334d2 to
aa76f0a
Compare
Overleaf has a bug where +x flags are being lost. This changes makes our Makefiles work even if the +x flag is lost.
tobiasgrosser
force-pushed
the
do_not_rely_on_x_flag
branch
from
aa76f0a to
22c4087
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Overleaf has a bug where +x flags are being lost. This change makes our Makefiles work even if the +x flag is lost.