Skip to content

Use new upstream software development container#349

Open
colluca wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
snitch-sw-container-revamped
Open

Use new upstream software development container#349
colluca wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
snitch-sw-container-revamped

Conversation

@colluca
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@colluca colluca commented Feb 25, 2026

This is a draft proposal to align with the latest software development container for Snitch.

While I copied over Snitch's dependencies (i.e. the Verilated Snitch model binary and the toolchain into your Docker container, it is not strictly necessary to actually "merge" them). This might actually cause problems down the line if the two base OSes diverge.

As mentioned in our meeting, shipping the Snitch repo inside the container is not very flexible, reason for which we departed from this solution upstream.
Obviously this requires that it is locally cloned and mounted in the container, see suggested usage.

My proposal would just be to submodule Snitch, but I'm not too familiar with this repo's structure and requirements, so I wait for your feedback on this.

This PR supersedes #340.

@superlopuh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Looks like a real error in the CI:

kernels/saxpy/64xf32/snrt.c:3:10: fatal error: 'snrt.h' file not found
#include <snrt.h>

Do you see this locally if you run make fast in src?

@colluca
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

colluca commented Mar 4, 2026

I'm afraid I won't have time to fix the PR until end of the month. But I'll come back to this after that.

@superlopuh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

No worries, I'll try to debug it before then

@colluca
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

colluca commented Mar 5, 2026

In that case, I pushed the fixes I started working on in the last commit, in case they might help

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants