README for static route with next-hop vlan interface

[daveruturaj]

Created a README.md for static route with vlan next-hop.

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @daveruturaj, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new README.md file within the feature/staticroute/otg_tests/static_route_with_vlan_interface/ directory. While the file is currently empty, its creation marks the intention to provide documentation for static route configurations involving VLAN next-hops in this specific test context.

Highlights

• New README.md: A new README.md file has been added to the feature/staticroute/otg_tests/static_route_with_vlan_interface/ directory.
• Initial Creation: The README.md file is currently empty, serving as a placeholder for future documentation regarding static routes with VLAN next-hops.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[OpenConfigBot]

Pull Request Functional Test Report for #4938 / 654e9d4

No tests identified for validation.

Help

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new README.md file for a test on static routes with a VLAN next-hop. However, the file is currently empty. According to the repository's contribution guidelines, this file must be populated with a detailed test plan following the specified template.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 20723677444

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 10.023%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 20704703562:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	2227
Relevant Lines:	22219

---

💛 - Coveralls

[daveruturaj]

Created README.md with IPv4/IPV6 static routes with vlan interface as a next-hop.

[dplore]

/gemini review

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds a new test plan (README.md) for static routes with a VLAN interface next-hop and registers it. The test plan has several issues that need to be addressed, including violations of the IP addressing style guide, logical errors in the test procedure, and incomplete test coverage for the main feature. Additionally, there are some typos and areas for clarification in the documentation.

[vvlakshmanamurthy]

LGTM

[daveruturaj]

Resolved automation generated comments