chore: dummy pr

[jland-redhat]

Validating our E2E test work.

Looks like a change to IPP may cause issuse

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated formatting in the Technology Stack section of README.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jland-redhat

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jland-redhat]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[coderabbitai]

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Line 10 of README.md — the KServe bullet in the Technology Stack section — has trailing whitespace added. No text content, links, or structure changed.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 8 | ❌ 2

❌ Failed checks (1 warning, 1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
No Sensitive Data In Logs	⚠️ Warning	Response body logging at line 383 of maas-api/internal/models/discovery.go exposes unredacted response bodies from external model endpoints, which may contain error messages with credentials, custo...	Replace raw response body logging with redacted error details only; omit response body content from logs unless explicitly redacted for safe content (JSON field names, error status codes only).
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'chore: dummy pr' is vague and non-descriptive, using generic language that conveys no meaningful information about the changeset beyond a meta-reference to the PR itself being 'dummy'.	Replace with a specific, descriptive title that indicates the actual change (e.g., 'chore: fix whitespace in README KServe section' or 'chore: validate E2E test changes for IPP compatibility').

✅ Passed checks (8 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Contribution Quality And Spam Detection	✅ Passed	PR adds trailing whitespace to README.md (likely erroneous per review comment). While PR title/description show weak signals (vague "dummy pr", typo), no SECURITY THEATER or CODE QUALITY signals ap...
No Hardcoded Secrets	✅ Passed	Comprehensive scan of commit 60d8a5d found no hardcoded secrets. All documented examples use placeholders (... paste here), base64 strings are Docker SHAs or paths, and dynamic token generation use...
No Weak Cryptography	✅ Passed	No weak cryptographic primitives (MD5, SHA1, DES, RC4, 3DES, Blowfish, ECB) found. SHA-256 and HMAC-SHA256 properly implemented. Constant-time comparison via crypto/subtle.ConstantTimeCompare used...
No Injection Vectors	✅ Passed	No injection vectors detected. CWE-89: SQL uses parameterized queries. CWE-78/94/502/79: No eval, exec, shell=True, yaml.load, pickle.loads, or dangerouslySetInnerHTML patterns found.
No Privileged Containers	✅ Passed	PR contains primarily documentation (README.md) and deployment manifests. No privileged container configurations detected: zero instances of privileged: true, hostPID, hostNetwork, hostIPC, SYS_ADM...

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Line 10: The KServe bullet point line contains trailing whitespace after
"Model serving platform" which needs to be removed. Navigate to the line
containing the KServe bullet point definition and remove any whitespace
characters at the end of the line after "platform" to clean up the formatting
and prevent VCS diff noise.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Central YAML (base), Organization UI (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 9b6e7f64-4cbe-41bc-8ac3-0a1e8f842089

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c5d9f05 and 60d8a5d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

Remove trailing whitespace from KServe bullet.

Line 10 contains trailing whitespace after "Model serving platform," which can cause VCS diff noise and may trigger CI/CD linting checks.

🧹 Remove trailing whitespace

-- **KServe**: Model serving platform 
+- **KServe**: Model serving platform

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	- **KServe**: Model serving platform
	- **KServe**: Model serving platform

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In `@README.md` at line 10, The KServe bullet point line contains trailing
whitespace after "Model serving platform" which needs to be removed. Navigate to
the line containing the KServe bullet point definition and remove any whitespace
characters at the end of the line after "platform" to clean up the formatting
and prevent VCS diff noise.