Support polars 1.41.2#95
Conversation
|
Huh: didn't remember adding anything upstream that would break. Looking into it... |
…error" that was dropped in last merge.
eddiestudies
left a comment
eddiestudies
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is this supposed to be removing the recent 1.36.1 changes?
@eddiestudies : No: Can you point at the change that gave you that impression? The biggest deletion block is where it was matching a list of numeric types. The latest polars release adds to that list, and I thought it didn't make sense to add complexity to handle both, and it can just be grabbed in a wildcard... but that might not be what you're looking at. |
|
|
||
| - Python versions: Tested against Python 3.10 and 3.13. | ||
| - Polars versions: Tested against Polars 1.32.0 and 1.36.1. | ||
| - Polars versions: Tested against Polars 1.32.0 and 1.41.2. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This and here made me think we are no longer testing 1.36.1.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry for confusion: I meant to just indicate the range being tested, but could just list them all here.
- '1.32.0' # OpenDP v0.14.1
- '1.36.1' # OpenDP v0.15.1
- '1.41.2' # Latest release
I'll make a tweak.
2 participants
Not needed right now to support OpenDP, but thought it would be easy to address while I'm thinking about it.