fix: ensure navigation sidebar serves fresh data after course publish

[wgu-taylor-payne]

Summary

After a course publish, there is a ~30-second window where the navigation sidebar endpoint serves stale block structure data. Worse, the stale response is cached for 1 hour, extending the staleness far beyond the initial window.

This PR adds a synchronous staleness check before reading the block structure on a navigation cache miss.

Problem

This issue was brought to light while testing an internal Open edX instance. A unit was deleted in Studio, a refresh in the course in the learning MFE still showed the unit in the course outline.

In a Verawood sandbox, I deleted a unit in Studio, waited 30+ seconds and then refreshed and the unit was removed from the outline in the learning MFE. I deleted another unit in Studio and refreshed the course page within a few seconds, and the deleted unit still showed. Refreshing again before an hour passed, it still showed. Refreshing after an hour, it was no longer present in the outline.

Three components interact to create a race condition:

1. Block structure rebuild is delayed 30s after publish

The course_published signal handler queues the rebuild task with a 30s countdown:

update_course_in_cache_v2.apply_async(
    kwargs=dict(course_id=str(course_key)),
    countdown=settings.BLOCK_STRUCTURES_SETTINGS['COURSE_PUBLISH_TASK_DELAY'],
)

2. Navigation cache key includes course version — causing a miss on publish

The cache key uses course_version, so after a publish the version changes and the previous cached response no longer matches. This is a cache miss.

3. On cache miss, stale block structure data is read and cached for 1 hour

The if not course_blocks branch calls get_course_outline_block_tree(), which reads from the (still stale) block structure cache, then stores the result for 1 hour.

Timeline:

1. T+0s: Course published — new version, block structure rebuild queued with 30s delay
2. T+1s: Learner hits navigation → cache miss (new version) → reads stale block structure → caches stale data for 1 hour
3. T+30s: Rebuild task runs, block structure updated (but navigation cache already poisoned)
4. T+1s → T+1h: All requests served stale data from navigation cache

Fix

Before reading the block structure on a cache miss, call update_collected_if_needed(). This compares the cached block structure version against the modulestore version and synchronously rebuilds only if stale.

Performance impact

• Cache hit (common case): No change.
• Cache miss, block structure current: One lightweight is_up_to_date check (DB read + version comparison).
• Cache miss, block structure stale (the bug): Synchronous rebuild — same work the delayed Celery task would do, just done eagerly instead of serving stale data.

Testing

To run the automated test:

tutor dev run lms pytest --ds=lms.envs.test \
  lms/djangoapps/course_home_api/outline/tests/test_view.py::SidebarBlocksTestViews::test_navigation_serves_fresh_data_after_publish

Manual steps:

• In a production like environment (i.e. Celery used to process async tasks)
• Delete a unit in Studio
• Refresh the course in the learning MFE within 30 seconds
• Verify that the unit is no longer listed in the course outline

AI Usage

Used Kiro with model set to auto to aid in the discovery of the root cause of the error, talk through potential fixes, come up with a test that addresses the issue being fixed, and write this PR summary.

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @wgu-taylor-payne!

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/wg-maintenance-openedx-platform.

Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review.

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

• If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
  • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
• If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

• Dependencies

  This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

• Blockers

  This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

• Timeline information

  This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

• Partner information

  This is for a course on edx.org.

• Supporting documentation
• Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

Details

---

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

• Overview of Review Process for Community Contributions
• Pull Request Status Guide
• Making changes to your pull request

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

• The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
• The need for product review
• Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.