feat: add changeBarcode to ProductOpenerApiV2

[garvit-bhattt]

What

• Added the changeBarcode(currentCode, newCode, credentials) method manually to the ProductOpenerApiV2 class in src/off-v2.ts.
• Bypassed the OpenAPI validation for new_code by casting the body to any, ensuring absolutely zero interference with other auto-generated schema files.

[VaiTon]

Bypassed the OpenAPI validation for new_code by casting the body to any, ensuring absolutely zero interference with other auto-generated schema files.

We should fix this at the OpenAPI layer if possible. Casting to any is never good.

[garvit-bhattt]

@VaiTon I've regenerated the local OpenAPI types pointing to the updated openfoodfacts-server spec which now includes new_code, and I have removed the as any cast from the changeBarcode payload. Let me know if everything looks good now.

[VaiTon]

❯ head -n5 src/schemas/server/v2.ts
/**
 * This file was auto-generated by openapi-typescript.
 * Do not make direct changes to the file.
 */

v2.ts is regenerated using the OpenAPI definition stored in the server repository. See redocly.yaml and package.json for details.

[garvit-bhattt]

@VaiTon I've reverted the v2.ts changes. Now it just removes the as any cast in off-v2.ts.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 73.92%. Comparing base (f49e749) to head (3a6398d).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/off-v2.ts	0.00%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #782      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    74.72%   73.92%   -0.81%     
===========================================
  Files           13       13              
  Lines          368      372       +4     
  Branches        82       84       +2     
===========================================
  Hits           275      275              
- Misses          69       73       +4     
  Partials        24       24              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[garvit-bhattt]

@VaiTon Should I also add lightweight SDK-side checks (prevent same-barcode updates and basic barcode format validation) for better DX, or do you prefer relying fully on backend validation?

[VaiTon]

Can't we just use credentials?.username? Are these fields mandatory?

[garvit-bhattt]

These fields are not strictly guaranteed to be present on credentials, so the fallback prevents undefined from being sent in the payload. Happy to simplify it.

[VaiTon]

I'd like to not even include the fields if the corresponding fields are undefined.

[garvit-bhattt]

I'll update the payload to omit these fields when the corresponding credentials values are undefined.

[garvit-bhattt]

@VaiTon I have pushed the changed requested

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud