-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
docs: Enhance pull request template with guidelines #448
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -1,11 +1,37 @@ | ||||||
| <!-- | ||||||
| ⚠️ Acceptance Requirements | ||||||
| **This Pull Request will only be accepted if:** | ||||||
| - ✅ There's an agreement by a maintainer or core contributor in the linked issue to assign it to the author of this PR | ||||||
| --> | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| <!-- | ||||||
| ⚠️ Please name your pull request title following this scheme: `type: What you did` this allows us to automatically generate the changelog | ||||||
| Following `type`s are allowed: | ||||||
| - `feat`, for Features | ||||||
| - `fix`, for Bug Fixes | ||||||
| - `docs`, for Documentation | ||||||
| - `ci`, for Automation | ||||||
| - `style`, for Code style changes (formatting, whitespace, etc.) | ||||||
| - `refactor`, for code Refactoring | ||||||
| - `chore`, for Miscellaneous things | ||||||
| - `test`, for Adding or updating tests | ||||||
| - `build`, for Build system or dependency changes | ||||||
| - `revert`, for Reverting previous changes | ||||||
| - `l10n`, for Localization and translation updates | ||||||
| - `taxonomy`, for Changes to product categories and tags taxonomy | ||||||
| --> | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Description | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| - Brief note about the issue | ||||||
| - Brief note about the Pull Request | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Solution | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| - Mention how your solution resolves the issue | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| ## Related issue(s) | ||||||
| ### Large Language Models usage disclosure | ||||||
| <!-- ⚠️ If you used an LLM, please disclose which LLM you used (and its version) and how (agentic, autocomplete). Please confirm you have run the code successfully on your device (or in CI). Also provide a screenshot or video as proof --> | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| - Fixes #[ISSUE NUMBER] | ||||||
| ### Related issue(s) and discussion | ||||||
| <!-- Please add the issue number this issue will close, that way, once your pull request is merged, the issue will be closed as well --> | ||||||
| - Fixes: <!-- #1 Note: you can also use Closes: --> | ||||||
|
||||||
| - Fixes: <!-- #1 Note: you can also use Closes: --> | |
| - Fixes #<issue-number> <!-- Note: you can also use Closes instead of Fixes --> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The PR title type list includes
l10nandtaxonomy, but the repo’s Semantic PR check runsamannn/action-semantic-pull-request@v6without any type configuration. That action’s defaults typically only allow the standard conventional-commit types, so these extra types may cause PRs to fail CI. Either remove unsupported types from this template or add an explicit configuration for the semantic PR action so the template matches what CI enforces.