Skip to content

docs: Potential fixes for 2 code quality findings - #13607

Merged
alexgarel merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ai-findings-autofix/lib-ProductOpener-Config.pm
May 18, 2026
Merged

docs: Potential fixes for 2 code quality findings#13607
alexgarel merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
ai-findings-autofix/lib-ProductOpener-Config.pm

Conversation

@teolemon

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This PR applies 2/2 suggestions from code quality AI findings.

teolemon and others added 2 commits May 17, 2026 13:27
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <223894421+github-code-quality[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <223894421+github-code-quality[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@codecov-commenter

codecov-commenter commented May 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 54.39%. Comparing base (8515452) to head (392054b).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #13607      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   49.13%   54.39%   +5.26%     
==========================================
  Files          97       98       +1     
  Lines       25621    25679      +58     
  Branches     6119     6128       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        12588    13969    +1381     
+ Misses      11398     9905    -1493     
- Partials     1635     1805     +170     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration-test-group-1 8.94% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-2 9.11% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-3 32.76% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-4 28.48% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-5 9.02% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-6 9.47% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-7 27.61% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-8 26.31% <ø> (?)
integration-test-group-9 12.91% <ø> (?)
unit-test-group-1 24.56% <ø> (ø)
unit-test-group-2 34.23% <ø> (ø)
unit-test-group-3 23.27% <ø> (ø)
unit-test-group-4 30.10% <ø> (ø)
unit-test-group-5 15.73% <ø> (ø)
unit-test-group-6 26.97% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@teolemon teolemon changed the title Potential fixes for 2 code quality findings doc: Potential fixes for 2 code quality findings May 18, 2026
@teolemon
teolemon marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2026 06:21
@teolemon
teolemon requested a review from a team as a code owner May 18, 2026 06:21
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 18, 2026 06:21
@teolemon teolemon changed the title doc: Potential fixes for 2 code quality findings docs: Potential fixes for 2 code quality findings May 18, 2026

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Fixes two minor typos in comments within lib/ProductOpener/Config.pm based on AI code quality findings.

Changes:

  • Correct "ommited" → "omitted"
  • Correct "Accents or often not present" → "Accents are often not present"

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this from To discuss and validate to Done in 🍊 Open Food Facts Server issues May 18, 2026
@alexgarel
alexgarel merged commit 8f26fa8 into main May 18, 2026
44 of 46 checks passed
@alexgarel
alexgarel deleted the ai-findings-autofix/lib-ProductOpener-Config.pm branch May 18, 2026 15:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants