taxonomy(food): dietary supplements edits - #13716
Merged
Merged
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
added
🧬 Taxonomies
github-project-automation
Bot
moved this to To discuss and validate
in 🍊 Open Food Facts Server issues
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #13716 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 49.58% 54.83% +5.25%
==========================================
Files 99 100 +1
Lines 25846 25904 +58
Branches 6172 6181 +9
==========================================
+ Hits 12816 14205 +1389
+ Misses 11360 9867 -1493
- Partials 1670 1832 +162
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Freso
force-pushed
the
freso/taxonomy/supplements
branch
from
June 4, 2026 20:19
9312261 to
d6ef1ee
Compare
Freso
force-pushed
the
freso/taxonomy/supplements
branch
3 times, most recently
from
June 4, 2026 22:21
a4ae49d to
eacbc9d
Compare
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Freso
force-pushed
the
freso/taxonomy/supplements
branch
from
June 5, 2026 12:38
ab8f976 to
57cc1e3
Compare
I was browsing the “Vitamins” category facet and noticed several mineral
supplements being listed there, and realising they didn’t have a good
other “home” (best would be the very generic “Dietary supplements”).
Additionally, a number of single-vitamin supplements seemed fairly
common and probably common enough to have their own categories.
As such, this PR:
- Makes category names explicitly specify that they’re supplements.
- Adds a number of new categories:
- Vitamin B₁₂, C, and D₃ supplements
- Mineral supplements, incl. calcium, iron, magnesium, and zinc ones.
- Translations mostly from Wikidata.
- Renames “Vitamin mineral combinations” to
“Multivitamin and mineral supplements”
- “Multivitamins” is colloquially used for supplements containing both
vitamins and minerals and possibly other dietary supplements too.
- Adds/updates some `wikidata` properties.
Freso
force-pushed
the
freso/taxonomy/supplements
branch
from
June 6, 2026 14:01
57cc1e3 to
40e7353
Compare
|
Contributor
|
looks good. This category needed some work |
Freso
enabled auto-merge (squash)
June 7, 2026 21:34
github-project-automation
Bot
moved this from To discuss and validate
to Done
in 🍊 Open Food Facts Server issues
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
5 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I was browsing the “Vitamins” category facet and noticed several mineral supplements being listed there, and realising they didn’t have a good other “home” (best would be the very generic “Dietary supplements”). Additionally, a number of single-vitamin supplements seemed fairly common and probably common enough to have their own categories.
As such, this PR:
wikidataproperties.