fix(openfort-swift): update skill file against Swift SDK v1.0.1

[emauja]

Summary

• Remove passkey references (not supported in Swift SDK)
• Fix debug config key to required (Bool, not Bool?)
• Add missing callbackURL param to OFVerifyEmailParams
• Add 17 previously undocumented SDK methods covering phone OTP, SIWE login, OAuth/wallet linking, account management, token validation, and session signatures

SDK Version

Verified against openfort-xyz/swift-sdk tag 1.0.1 (latest as of 2026-04-16)

What Changed

Category	Change
Passkey removal	Removed .passkey from OFRecoveryMethod enum and passkeyInfo from OFRecoveryParamsDTO — Passkeys are not supported
Config fix	debug in OFConfig.plist table changed from optional to required
Param fix	Added callbackURL: String? to OFVerifyEmailParams
New: Phone OTP	requestPhoneOtp, logInWithPhoneOtp, linkPhoneOtp
New: SIWE login	loginWithSiwe (direct single-step SIWE auth)
New: SIWE linking	initLinkSiwe, linkWithSiwe
New: OAuth linking	initLinkOAuth, poolOAuth, unlinkOAuth
New: Wallet linking	linkWallet, unlinkWallet
New: Email mgmt	addEmail, verifyEmailOtp
New: Account ops	get, create, recover, list
New: Token mgmt	validateAndRefreshToken
New: Session sig	sendSignatureSessionRequest

Note

The openfort-xyz/documentation repository referenced in the review schedule does not exist. Only the skill file (Part 1) was reviewed. Remaining undocumented utility methods (ping, getEmbeddedState, getURL) were omitted as they are internal/diagnostic.

Fixes #25

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[emauja]

Re-verification (2026-04-20)

Re-verified against openfort-xyz/swift-sdk tag 1.0.1 (latest — unchanged since this PR was created).

All changes in this PR remain accurate and necessary:

• ✅ Passkey removal still correct (Passkeys not supported)
• ✅ debug config key fix still needed (Bool, not Bool?)
• ✅ callbackURL addition to OFVerifyEmailParams still needed
• ✅ All 17 newly documented methods verified against SDK source

No additional discrepancies found beyond what this PR addresses. Recommend merge.

[emauja]

Re-verification (2026-04-23)

Re-verified against openfort-xyz/swift-sdk tag 1.0.1 (commit 7558e0d) — still the latest published tag (unchanged since 2026-02-06).

No new SDK changes since the previous re-verification on 2026-04-20. The only post-tag commit on main is 0e27492 ("fix: remove deprecated ecosystemGame parameter", 2026-03-20), which is unreleased and intentionally excluded from documentation per the deprecation policy.

All fixes in this PR remain correct and necessary:

• Passkey removal (Passkeys not supported by Swift SDK)
• debug config key typed as Bool (not Bool?)
• callbackURL: String? added to OFVerifyEmailParams (verified against Sources/OpenfortSwift/DTO/OFVerifyEmailParams.swift@1.0.1)
• 17 newly documented methods verified against the protocol files in Sources/OpenfortSwift/Protocols/ at tag 1.0.1

Recommend merge. No additional discrepancies; the skill file is accurate once this PR lands.

---

Automated re-verification by worker-6 (task 49a0ac6f-75cf-40eb-932b-443a504f5b1c).

[emauja]

Re-verification (2026-04-27)

Re-verified against openfort-xyz/swift-sdk tag 1.0.1 (commit 7558e0d) — still the latest published tag, unchanged since 2026-02-06.

No new SDK changes since the previous re-verification on 2026-04-23:

• Latest release tag: 1.0.1 (no new tags)
• Only post-tag commit on main is 0e27492 (2026-03-20, removes deprecated ecosystemGame) — still unreleased and per policy not documented anyway.

All findings in this PR remain accurate and necessary. Ready for review.

Task target mismatches still present in the upstream review prompt

• The prompt references openfort-xyz/openfort-swift — actual repo is openfort-xyz/swift-sdk.
• The prompt references openfort-xyz/documentation — that repo does not exist (404).
• The prompt references skill path public/skills/openfort-swift.md — actual path is skills/embedded-wallet/references/openfort-swift.md in this repo (openfort-xyz/agent-skills).

cc @tarasyarema — this PR has been waiting for review since 2026-04-16. Could a maintainer take a look?