Migration of the GeoParquet specification to the official OGC templates

[m-mohr]

Based on #219 and #206. Original author is @ghobona.
Making this a draft for now because the CI is failing, but I don't have the time and knowledge about metanorma to fix this.

Adds back the following commits:

• 5d67a9c
• 471a2f8
• 2aa0668
• a727140

The docs may need to be updated with the commits that were merged afterwards:
fe3687d...main

[kylebarron]

The CI only checks that there's a single newline at the end of each file, and that there are no superfluous whitespace characters at the end of each line.

If you run pre-commit run --all-files locally (after pip install pre-commit), then it will apply the fixes locally; you just have to commit them.

[m-mohr]

That was too easy, lol. Thanks, @kylebarron.

[cholmes]

Thanks @m-mohr. I'll try to edit the readme today, and take it out of draft status.

[cholmes]

Ok, I think this is ready for review now. I updated the readme to try to explain what's going on, and put in more links.

I am leaning towards just removing the extra folders on images, figures and code, and it seems like if we want those later we can add them back in.

I think we ideally get this merged back in pretty soon, and then can continue to iterate on main, so that the OGC docs can continue to build.

[m-mohr]

@cholmes The docs probably need to be updated with the commits that were merged afterwards:
fe3687d...main
Did you do that already?

[cholmes]

I think most of those are not needed? This just targets 1.0, so we don’t want the latest changes to 1.1. Though I should probably make that a bit more clear, I still need to update the section on ‘authoring’.

[m-mohr]

Oh, this is meant to target 1.0 and not 1.1? Is that ensured that there are no 1.1 changes in the docs?

[cholmes]

Yeah, it's for 1.0. Good point that we should be sure there are no 1.1 things that are in it.