feat: add ci checks #5
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Test case: |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context
This repo contains a custom codeql config which is used by some repos in their workflows.
In a previous incident, updating the codeql config resulted in failures in another project's pipeline.
Approach
This PR adds a
ci.ymlthat is similar to what other repos use in their codeql workflow.If the workflow succeeds, it means that the configuration will not break builds in the future (barring the removal of codeql packs from our container registry)
We should make sure that merging is blocked if this workflow fails.
Testing
Will test with a nonexistent codeql pack afterwards