Translate Lua modulefiles to Tcl and define default version with `.version` file by xdelaruelle · Pull Request #2680 · openhpc/ohpc

xdelaruelle · 2026-09-05T16:10:12Z

Translate the 5 existing Lua modulefiles into Tcl to harmonize all OpenHPC modulefiles in this language.

Change the 6 existing default symlink into Tcl .version modulerc files to harmonize the way module default version are defined in all OpenHPC packages.

This change is part of the preparatory work for the addition of Environment Modules (#2470)

adrianreber · 2026-09-09T12:33:22Z

Thanks. I think this might be one of the first PR I will be looking at and testing.

github-actions · 2026-09-09T12:33:34Z

📊 Build Order Analysis Results

Environment: AlmaLinux 10 Container
Total Spec Files Analyzed: 89
Status: ✅ Build order analysis completed successfully

📋 Build Order Output

📦 Build Order (84 packages)

➕ Show remaining 69 packages

Analysis performed by OpenHPC Build Order CI
Commit: ad0ebce3
Workflow: 34456093898

github-actions · 2026-09-09T12:33:34Z

📦 Package Count Analysis Results

Environment: UBI 10 Container
Target Branch: 4.x
Version: OpenHPC 4.x
Overall Status: ✅ Analysis completed successfully

🏭 Factory Repositories

Status: ✅ Factory repositories analysis completed successfully

Release	Base OS	aarch64	x86_64	noarch	Total
4.2	EL_10	71	112	12	195
4.2	openEuler_24.03	66	73	12	151
Total	All	137	185	24	346

Analysis performed by OpenHPC Package Count CI
Commit: ad0ebce3
Workflow: 34456094099

adrianreber · 2026-09-09T12:34:47Z

This probably needs to be split in smaller PRs. The GCC rebuild usually takes almost as long as GitHub Actions allows it. So it probably will not finish.

xdelaruelle · 2026-09-09T13:02:28Z

This probably needs to be split in smaller PRs. The GCC rebuild usually takes almost as long as GitHub Actions allows it. So it probably will not finish.

If I do a specific PR for GCC and another for the other packages, do you think it will be ok?

adrianreber · 2026-09-09T13:04:27Z

This probably needs to be split in smaller PRs. The GCC rebuild usually takes almost as long as GitHub Actions allows it. So it probably will not finish.

If I do a specific PR for GCC and another for the other packages, do you think it will be ok?

Yes, that should work. Only trilinos would be a problem as it takes forever to build.

github-actions · 2026-09-09T13:14:38Z

🚀 CCache Statistics

Configuration	🐧 RHEL	🦊 openEuler
🖥️ x86_64 / gnu15	🟡 36.46%	🔴 3.59%
🖥️ x86_64 / intel	🟡 31.24%	-
💪 aarch64 / gnu15	🔴 3.68%	🔴 3.61%

📊 Detailed Statistics

openEuler (aarch64)

Cacheable calls:    4463 / 6196 (72.03%)
  Hits:              161 / 4463 ( 3.61%)
    Direct:          133 /  161 (82.61%)
    Preprocessed:     28 /  161 (17.39%)
  Misses:           4302 / 4463 (96.39%)
Uncacheable calls:  1733 / 6196 (27.97%)
Local storage:
  Cache size (GiB):  0.4 /  5.0 ( 8.14%)
  Hits:              161 / 4463 ( 3.61%)
  Misses:           4302 / 4463 (96.39%)

openEuler (x86_64)

Cacheable calls:    4649 / 6518 (71.33%)
  Hits:              167 / 4649 ( 3.59%)
    Direct:          139 /  167 (83.23%)
    Preprocessed:     28 /  167 (16.77%)
  Misses:           4482 / 4649 (96.41%)
Uncacheable calls:  1869 / 6518 (28.67%)
Local storage:
  Cache size (GiB):  0.4 /  5.0 ( 8.70%)
  Hits:              167 / 4649 ( 3.59%)
  Misses:           4482 / 4649 (96.41%)

RHEL (aarch64/gnu15)

Cacheable calls:    4242 / 5790 (73.26%)
  Hits:              156 / 4242 ( 3.68%)
    Direct:           86 /  156 (55.13%)
    Preprocessed:     70 /  156 (44.87%)
  Misses:           4086 / 4242 (96.32%)
Uncacheable calls:  1548 / 5790 (26.74%)
Local storage:
  Cache size (GiB):  0.4 /  5.0 ( 8.15%)
  Hits:              156 / 4242 ( 3.68%)
  Misses:           4086 / 4242 (96.32%)

RHEL (x86_64/gnu15)

Cacheable calls:    12137 / 19587 (61.96%)
  Hits:              4425 / 12137 (36.46%)
    Direct:          3362 /  4425 (75.98%)
    Preprocessed:    1063 /  4425 (24.02%)
  Misses:            7712 / 12137 (63.54%)
Uncacheable calls:   7450 / 19587 (38.04%)
Local storage:
  Cache size (GiB):   0.6 /   5.0 (12.81%)
  Hits:              4425 / 12137 (36.46%)
  Misses:            7712 / 12137 (63.54%)

RHEL (x86_64/intel)

Cacheable calls:    15312 / 30634 (49.98%)
  Hits:              4783 / 15312 (31.24%)
    Direct:          3556 /  4783 (74.35%)
    Preprocessed:    1227 /  4783 (25.65%)
  Misses:           10529 / 15312 (68.76%)
Uncacheable calls:  15322 / 30634 (50.02%)
Local storage:
  Cache size (GiB):   0.6 /   5.0 (11.98%)
  Hits:              4783 / 15312 (31.24%)
  Misses:           10529 / 15312 (68.76%)

🤖 Generated from workflow run 34456093732

github-actions · 2026-09-09T15:33:34Z

Test Results

108 files + 75 108 suites +75 7m 18s ⏱️ + 6m 30s
309 tests +238 291 ✅ +226 18 💤 +12 0 ❌ ±0
534 runs +408 508 ✅ +390 26 💤 +18 0 ❌ ±0

Results for commit af5b573. ± Comparison against base commit d966218.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

xdelaruelle · 2026-09-09T16:27:01Z

This probably needs to be split in smaller PRs. The GCC rebuild usually takes almost as long as GitHub Actions allows it. So it probably will not finish.

If I do a specific PR for GCC and another for the other packages, do you think it will be ok?

Yes, that should work. Only trilinos would be a problem as it takes forever to build.

It seems it was able to finish. So is it still worth to split in 2 PRs?

openEuler job seems to fail on something else. Should I patch something?

xdelaruelle · 2026-09-10T05:37:16Z

openEuler job seems to fail on something else. Should I patch something?

I propose #2692 to fix the openEuler build issue with plasma. Rebased this PR on the other

Translate the 5 existing Lua modulefiles into Tcl to harmonize all OpenHPC modulefiles in this language. This change is part of the preparatory work for the addition of Environment Modules (openhpc#2470) Signed-off-by: Xavier Delaruelle <xavier.delaruelle@cea.fr>

Change the 6 existing "default" symlink into Tcl ".version" modulerc files to harmonize the way module default version are defined in all OpenHPC packages. This change is part of the preparatory work for the addition of Environment Modules (openhpc#2470) Signed-off-by: Xavier Delaruelle <xavier.delaruelle@cea.fr>

adrianreber · 2026-09-10T12:31:40Z

So, CI is happy, good. I would like to have one more discussion in the TSC before starting to merge your PRs. The next meeting is probably on 2026-09-16. From my side it looks ready.

We already agreed in the TSC that it would be a good addition for OpenHPC but let's have one more round in the TSC next week.

xdelaruelle mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2026

Component submission: environment-modules #2470

Open

22 tasks

adrianreber force-pushed the tcl_modulefiles branch from 06e24c9 to 13e1faa Compare September 9, 2026 12:33

xdelaruelle mentioned this pull request Sep 10, 2026

plasma: pass BLAS_LIBRARIES explicitly to cmake #2692

Merged

xdelaruelle force-pushed the tcl_modulefiles branch from 13e1faa to 27f828f Compare September 10, 2026 05:28

xdelaruelle added 2 commits September 10, 2026 10:36

adrianreber force-pushed the tcl_modulefiles branch from 27f828f to af5b573 Compare September 10, 2026 08:36

Uh oh!

Conversation

xdelaruelle commented Sep 5, 2026

Uh oh!

adrianreber commented Sep 9, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

📊 Build Order Analysis Results

📋 Build Order Output

📦 Build Order (84 packages)

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

📦 Package Count Analysis Results

🏭 Factory Repositories

Uh oh!

adrianreber commented Sep 9, 2026

Uh oh!

xdelaruelle commented Sep 9, 2026

Uh oh!

adrianreber commented Sep 9, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

🚀 CCache Statistics

openEuler (aarch64)

openEuler (x86_64)

RHEL (aarch64/gnu15)

RHEL (x86_64/gnu15)

RHEL (x86_64/intel)

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Test Results

Uh oh!

xdelaruelle commented Sep 9, 2026

Uh oh!

xdelaruelle commented Sep 10, 2026

Uh oh!

adrianreber commented Sep 10, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

github-actions Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented Sep 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading