Skip to content

Conversation

@Sakurann
Copy link
Contributor

resolves #116

@Sakurann Sakurann requested a review from bc-pi November 28, 2024 20:19
Copy link
Member

@c2bo c2bo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am wondering if we should remove the remark for Section 12.4? Section 12.4 is linked to within 7.2 and I am not sure we gain any real value from an informative mention in HAIP?

@Sakurann
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sakurann commented Dec 3, 2024

I am wondering if we should remove the remark for Section 12.4? Section 12.4 is linked to within 7.2 and I am not sure we gain any real value from an informative mention in HAIP?

@c2bo can you please quote the text you mean? I will merge this and we can do a new PR if needed.

@Sakurann Sakurann merged commit ca3b24b into main Dec 3, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Mandate response encryption in OID4VP part of HAIP

6 participants