Skip to content

Conversation

@mrserb
Copy link
Member

@mrserb mrserb commented Dec 23, 2025

The copyright year in client-area files updated in 2025 has been bumped to 2025.

The next command can be run (on top of this PR) to verify that each file had prior commits in 2025:

git diff HEAD~1 --name-only | while read f; do git log HEAD~1 --since="2025-01-01" --oneline -- "$f" | head -1 | grep -q . || echo "NOT IN 2025: $f"; done


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8374310: Update copyright year to 2025 for client-libs in files where it was missed (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28969/head:pull/28969
$ git checkout pull/28969

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28969
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28969/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28969

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28969

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28969.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 23, 2025

👋 Welcome back serb! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 23, 2025

@mrserb This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8374310: Update copyright year to 2025 for client-libs in files where it was missed

Reviewed-by: jdv

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 3 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • a59dbc5: 8373475: Unintentional format string in logString of AccessInfo.cpp
  • 72e1e15: 8373474: 2 Unintentional format string defect groups in jabswitch.cpp
  • f5249db: 8374233: Overloaded constructor MountUnmountDisabler(jthread thread) is missed

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 23, 2025

@mrserb The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • client
  • i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mrserb mrserb marked this pull request as ready for review December 23, 2025 23:42
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 23, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 23, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

client [email protected] i18n [email protected] ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants