Skip to content

Conversation

opensearch-ci-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

I have noticed that a repo has incremented a version. This change updates the corresponding input manifests.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 25, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.57%. Comparing base (ac83235) to head (da1b665).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5709      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.55%   96.57%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         404      404              
  Lines       18424    18506      +82     
==========================================
+ Hits        17790    17872      +82     
  Misses        634      634              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

}
triggers {
parameterizedCron '''
H 1 * * * %INPUT_MANIFEST=3.3.0/opensearch-dashboards-3.3.0.yml;TARGET_JOB_NAME=distribution-build-opensearch-dashboards;BUILD_PLATFORM=linux windows;BUILD_DISTRIBUTION=tar rpm deb zip;TEST_MANIFEST=3.3.0/opensearch-dashboards-3.3.0-test.yml;TEST_PLATFORM=linux;TEST_DISTRIBUTION=tar;UPDATE_GITHUB_ISSUE=false
Copy link
Member

@gaiksaya gaiksaya Aug 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added UPDATE_GITHUB_ISSUE=false I believe it is better to enable once we are close to the release.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you update check-for-build to have this parameter available?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Via automation: NO! Will add this once this is functional. Just worried we might forget to remove this and then maintainers might complain about the failures not being reported. WDYT?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can revisit this later. Removing it for now. Creating issues because version increment is not merged might also force people to take action.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure, thanks.

Signed-off-by: opensearch-ci <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sayali Gaikawad <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Sayali Gaikawad <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sayali Gaikawad <[email protected]>

Signed-off-by: Sayali Gaikawad <[email protected]>
@gaiksaya gaiksaya merged commit 7028348 into main Aug 26, 2025
29 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 👀 In Review to ✅ Done in Engineering Effectiveness Board Aug 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: ✅ Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants