Skip to content

Conversation

hainenber
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Describe what this change achieves.

  • Upgrade minimum Go version to 1.24 to gain some small performance enhancements in 1.22, 1.23 and 1.24

  • Remove external usage of golang.org/x/exp with Go's standard library slices.

Issues Resolved

List any issues this PR will resolve, e.g. Closes [...].

N/A

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 22, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.28%. Comparing base (06a6dc8) to head (8d5bc56).
⚠️ Report is 114 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #674      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   57.29%   60.28%   +2.99%     
==========================================
  Files         315      377      +62     
  Lines        9823    11684    +1861     
==========================================
+ Hits         5628     7044    +1416     
- Misses       2902     3205     +303     
- Partials     1293     1435     +142     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 52.83% <ø> (+1.99%) ⬆️
unit 14.81% <ø> (+1.96%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 108 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@hainenber
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think the failed integration tests were due to flakiness? It seems odd to have older version compatibility tests succeeded (2.3, 2.4 for example) whilst newer didn't 🤔

@dblock
Copy link
Member

dblock commented Jul 5, 2025

Rebase?

@hainenber
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased :D

@dblock
Copy link
Member

dblock commented Jul 5, 2025

LGTM, see why integ tests failed?

@hainenber
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think it's the flakiness again

@Jakob3xD Jakob3xD merged commit 9491279 into opensearch-project:main Oct 6, 2025
104 of 105 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants