Skip to content

Conversation

@joepvd
Copy link
Contributor

@joepvd joepvd commented Oct 17, 2025

No description provided.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 17, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign sosiouxme for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@joepvd joepvd force-pushed the fix-base-repos-4.21 branch from 654e66f to 0dcb11d Compare October 17, 2025 12:35
ppc64le: https://rhsm-pulp.corp.redhat.com/content/eus/rhel9/9.4/ppc64le/codeready-builder/os/
s390x: https://rhsm-pulp.corp.redhat.com/content/eus/rhel9/9.4/s390x/codeready-builder/os/
x86_64: https://rhsm-pulp.corp.redhat.com/content/eus/rhel9/9.4/x86_64/codeready-builder/os/
aarch64: https://rhsm-pulp.corp.redhat.com/content/e4s/rhel9/9.4/aarch64/codeready-builder/os/
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets use EUS for codeready-builder and E4S for everything else. I'm not sure exactly what comes from this repo but the worst that happens is we stop receiving updates for that subset of packages, which would happen anyway. This at least means one less thing for us to forget for all the other repos that DO have e4s.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants