-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 115
Address false reports of bootcmdline conflicts #1371
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jmencak The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
This significantly reduces false reports of bootcmdline conflicts in operator logs and ClusterOperator/node-tuning object. This is not a bullet-proof solution. A bullet-proof solution would involve adding a new annotation such as tuned.openshift.io/lastProfileObservedGen to the Node tied to the Profile and comparing it to the Profile's generation prior to updating a MachineConfig. However, we want to avoid putting extra load on the API server as much as possible and this simpler solution already significantly reduces false reports of bootcmdline conflicts.
85cc657
to
e8a6d46
Compare
/cc @liqcui |
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-pao and ci/prow/e2e-hypershift-pao will keep failing until #1374 merges. |
/verified by @liqcui |
@liqcui: This PR has been marked as verified by In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
verified in a small size cluster, did several testing, no issue, the issue reproduced in the same small size worker nodes using 4.20 nightly version. the new pr did fix the issue |
/retest |
@jmencak: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
This significantly reduces false reports of bootcmdline conflicts in operator logs and
ClusterOperator/node-tuning
object.This is not a bullet-proof solution. A bullet-proof solution would involve adding a new annotation such as
tuned.openshift.io/lastProfileObservedGen
to the Node tied to the Profile and comparing it to the Profile's generation prior to updating a MachineConfig. However, we want to avoid putting extra load on the API server as much as possible and this simpler solution already significantly reduces false reports of bootcmdline conflicts.