OCPBUGS-44857: Separate resources with comma to fix malformed inspect

[palonsoro]

Fix for: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-44857

oc adm inspect --all-namespaces command was malformed, so its resources were never gathered.

[palonsoro]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@palonsoro: No Jira issue is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a jira issue, add 'XYZ-NNN:' to the title of this pull request and request another refresh with /jira refresh.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@palonsoro: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44857, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target either version "4.18." or "openshift-4.18.", but it targets "4.19.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

Fix for: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-44857

oc adm inspect --all-namespaces command was malformed, so its resources were never gathered.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[palonsoro]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@palonsoro: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44857, which is invalid:

• expected the bug to target either version "4.18." or "openshift-4.18.", but it targets "4.19.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[palonsoro]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@palonsoro: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44857, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.18.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.0)
• bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zhouying7780

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[flavianmissi]

/lgtm

Since we let a couple of bugs slip in I'll put this on hold until someone from QE can test this.
/hold

@zhouying7780 you previously have helped me test changes in must-gather repository, are you able to do pre-merge testing on this PR?

/retest

[palonsoro]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@palonsoro: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44857, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.18.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zhouying7780

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[zhouying7780]

/label qe-approved

[zhouying7780]

build the must-gather image and tested , can't reproduce the issue now :
error: there is no need to specify a resource type as a separate argument when passing arguments in resource/name form (e.g. 'oc get resource/<resource_name>' instead of 'oc get resource resource/<resource_name>'

[flavianmissi]

Assigning Arda for approval

/assign @ardaguclu

[ardaguclu]

Thank you
/retitle OCPBUGS-44857: Separate resources with comma to fix malformed inspect
/approve

[ardaguclu]

/retest

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ardaguclu, flavianmissi, palonsoro

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• collection-scripts/OWNERS [ardaguclu]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ardaguclu]

/hold cancel

[palonsoro]

/jira refresh

[openshift-ci-robot]

@palonsoro: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44857, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target version (4.19.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.19.0)
• bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zhouying7780

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

@palonsoro: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@palonsoro: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44857: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

• openshift/must-gather#465

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-44857 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Fix for: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-44857

oc adm inspect --all-namespaces command was malformed, so its resources were never gathered.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-bot]

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-must-gather
This PR has been included in build ose-must-gather-container-v4.19.0-202411260335.p0.gc211c0b.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

[palonsoro]

/cherrypick release-4.18

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@palonsoro: new pull request created: #470

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.