Skip to content

Modified processor to processors in doc YAML #83113

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dhgautam99
Copy link
Contributor

@dhgautam99 dhgautam99 commented Oct 5, 2024

The YAMLs provided in the documentation used the word "processor" instead of "processors".

Version(s): 4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.15

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDA-972

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

The YAMLs provided in the documentation used the word "processor" instead of "processors".
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 5, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 5, 2024

Hi @dhgautam99. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh requested a review from max-cx December 13, 2024 20:29
@max-cx
Copy link
Contributor

max-cx commented Jan 27, 2025

@dhgautam99, 🙂 hi, Dhruv, thank you so much for opening this PR.
You are welcome to close it.
Please see an explanation in my comment in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-1641.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 28, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 28, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants