Skip to content

Update dynamic-provisioning-vsphere-definition.adoc #85880

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sbiradar10
Copy link

@sbiradar10 sbiradar10 commented Dec 5, 2024

Adding parameter section in storage class object definition.

Version(s): 4.14 to latest version

Issue: Good to have parameter section in sc for vSphere CSI driver

Link to docs preview: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.17/storage/dynamic-provisioning.html#vsphere-definition_dynamic-provisioning

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: We can add multiple parameter in storageclass object for vSphere CSI so having example definition would be great in official doc. For example , having supported filesystem type for vsphere csi storageclass object definition.

PTAL: @gnufied @gcharot @duanwei33

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 5, 2024
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 5, 2024

Hi @sbiradar10. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh requested a review from lpettyjo December 13, 2024 20:28
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 25, 2024

@sbiradar10: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/ok-to-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sbiradar10
Copy link
Author

/peer-review-needed

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 25, 2024

@skhette: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an /ok-to-test message.

In response to this:

/ok-to-test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sbiradar10
Copy link
Author

/peer-review-needed

1 similar comment
@sbiradar10
Copy link
Author

/peer-review-needed

@lpettyjo lpettyjo added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label Jan 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@lpettyjo lpettyjo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise, LGTM!

----
<1> Name of the storage class. The persistent volume claim uses this storage class for provisioning the associated persistent volumes.
<2> For more information about using VMware vSphere CSI with {product-title},
<3> XFS or EXT4 are supported filesystem type for vSphere CSI Driver.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change to: "The vSphere CSI driver supports all of the file systems supported by the underlying Red Hat Core operating system release, including XFS and Ext4."

@sbiradar10
Copy link
Author

/peer-review-needed

@@ -13,8 +13,11 @@ apiVersion: storage.k8s.io/v1
metadata:
name: <storage-class-name> <1>
provisioner: csi.vsphere.vmware.com <2>
parameters:
csi.storage.k8s.io/fstype: xfs <3>
----
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So this parameter is not specific to vSphere CSI driver and should be supported by all CSI drivers. A better place to document this is perhaps - https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.17/storage/container_storage_interface/persistent-storage-csi.html#csi-dynamic-provisioning_persistent-storage-csi

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @gnufied so do you want me to edit the files and modify for above doc url ? instead of specific vsphere?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@gnufied done from my end.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 20, 2025

@sbiradar10: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@gnufied
Copy link
Member

gnufied commented Feb 20, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 20, 2025
@duanwei33
Copy link

LTGM

@bergerhoffer
Copy link
Contributor

The branch/enterprise-4.19 label has been added to this PR.

This is because your PR targets the main branch and is labeled for enterprise-4.18. And any PR going into main must also target the latest version branch (enterprise-4.19).

If the update in your PR does NOT apply to version 4.19 onward, please re-target this PR to go directly into the appropriate version branch or branches (enterprise-4.x) instead of main.

@sbiradar10
Copy link
Author

Hello @bergerhoffer Thank you for the reply.
Yes this change can be added from 4.19 versions. so we can have this label as well.

@sbiradar10
Copy link
Author

/peer-review-needed

Copy link
Contributor

@lpettyjo lpettyjo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@lpettyjo lpettyjo added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels Mar 27, 2025
@sbiradar10
Copy link
Author

/peer-review-needed

@gcharot
Copy link

gcharot commented Apr 25, 2025

LGTM

@sbiradar10 sbiradar10 requested a review from lpettyjo May 12, 2025 09:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.14 branch/enterprise-4.15 branch/enterprise-4.16 branch/enterprise-4.17 branch/enterprise-4.18 branch/enterprise-4.19 lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants