<do-not-merge> RHDEVDOCS-6444: Content creation for GitOps 1.15.2 #92626
Conversation
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
jira/valid-reference
|
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6444 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
size/M
|
🤖 Fri May 16 07:02:15 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: https://92626--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/ |
|
/retest |
Dhruv-Soni11
force-pushed
the
RHDEVDOCS-6444
branch
2 times, most recently
from
db334e1 to
5b57240
Compare
|
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6444 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6444 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest |
|
@Dhruv-Soni11 please add RN from https://issues.redhat.com/browse/GITOPS-6150 once its available |
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/GITOPS-6150 RN is available, you can add it @Dhruv-Soni11, apologies, I missed mentioning this ticket before, and thanks Varsha for pointing out |
|
LGTM, thanks |
|
/label peer-review-needed |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
peer-review-needed
mburke5678
added
the
peer-review-in-progress
|
@Dhruv-Soni11 A few comments. Otherwise LGTM |
mburke5678
added
peer-review-done
Dhruv-Soni11
force-pushed
the
RHDEVDOCS-6444
branch
3 times, most recently
from
3b775b0 to
52f77be
Compare
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
Dhruv-Soni11
changed the title
|
/label merge-review-needed |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
merge-review-needed
|
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6444 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6444 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
mburke5678
added
the
merge-review-in-progress
|
@Dhruv-Soni11 Had a couple of comments before merge. Probably wouldn't have held up the merge over these issues. But, where we are not merging yet, maybe you could take a look. When it comes time to merge, let me know and we can avoid wasting the time of another merge reviewer over these two issues. |
mburke5678
removed
merge-review-in-progress
Thanks for performing a quick merge review on this PR, @mburke5678. I have fixed a couple of your comments and am waiting for further instructions from the QE and SME team to add the errata details. Once I get those details, I will update this PR and tag you for merge review. Thanks for the quick comments and suggestions. |
Fixed QE review comments Incorporating SME review comments
Dhruv-Soni11
force-pushed
the
RHDEVDOCS-6444
branch
from
c7d7094 to
4b8ad91
Compare
openshift-ci
bot
removed
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
Dhruv-Soni11
changed the title
|
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6444 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
merge-review-needed
|
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6444 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@Dhruv-Soni11: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
Dhruv-Soni11
changed the title
|
@Dhruv-Soni11: This pull request references RHDEVDOCS-6444 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
sheriff-rh
added
merge-review-in-progress
Version(s):
gitops-docs-1.15, gitops-docs-1.16, gitops-docs-main
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHDEVDOCS-6444
Link to docs preview:
Release Notes for GitOps v1.15.2
QE review:
SME review: @Rizwana777, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
QE review: @varshab1210
Peer review: @mburke5678
Additional information:
Kindly perform the merge review as per the normal steps, but do not merge the PR if everything looks fine, as the SME/QE team might provide us with an additional release note.