Skip to content

OSDOCS-14601 [NETOBSERV-2053] Flowlogs Flp filtering #93270

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: no-1.9
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gwynnemonahan
Copy link
Contributor

@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan commented May 13, 2025

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14601 [NETOBSERV-2053] Flowlogs Flp filtering

Version(s):
Merge to only the no-1.9 branch - no cherrypicks are required.
I will open one PR against main to incorporate all of the NetObserv content just before its GA.

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-14601

Link to docs preview:
https://93270--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/network_observability/configuring-operator.html#network-observability-config-flows-at-ingestion_network_observability

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 13, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented May 13, 2025

…wlogs-pipeline filters content updates (Squash)
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 13, 2025
@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan changed the title [NETOBSERV-2053] Flowlogs Flp filtering OSDOCS-14602 [NETOBSERV-2053] Flowlogs Flp filtering May 13, 2025
@gwynnemonahan gwynnemonahan changed the title OSDOCS-14602 [NETOBSERV-2053] Flowlogs Flp filtering OSDOCS-14601 [NETOBSERV-2053] Flowlogs Flp filtering May 15, 2025
…ns but commented out pending clarification from engineering (Squash)
sampling: 10 <2>
----
<1> Sends matching flows to a specific output, such as Loki, Prometheus, or an external system.
<2> Optional. Applies a sampling ratio to limit the number of flows that match the query.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Need more explanation about sampling. Will let @jotak put it into words

@Amoghrd
Copy link

Amoghrd commented May 15, 2025

/assign @jotak


The query language uses the following syntax:

Logical boolean operators (case insensitive)::
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 [error] RedHat.TermsErrors: Use 'not case-sensitive' rather than 'case insensitive'. For more information, see RedHat.TermsErrors.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 16, 2025

@gwynnemonahan: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.


[id="flowlogs-pipeline-configure_{context}"]
=== Flowlogs-pipeline configuration
You can configure flowlogs-pipeline filters in the `spec.processor.filters` parameter of the `FlowCollector` resource. For example:
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
You can configure flowlogs-pipeline filters in the `spec.processor.filters` parameter of the `FlowCollector` resource. For example:
You can configure flowlogs-pipeline filters in the `spec.processor.filters`section of the `FlowCollector` resource. For example:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants