Skip to content

[OSDOCS-12351]: Updating xrefs to etcd backup/restore content #93329

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lahinson
Copy link
Contributor

@lahinson lahinson commented May 14, 2025

Version(s): 4.19

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-12351

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information: This PR is part of the effort to consolidate all of the etcd content into one new book. This PR removes the etcd-related backup and restore content from the "Backup and restore" book and redirects links to their new locations.

Related PRs: #93059, #93389

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 14, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented May 14, 2025

🤖 Wed May 14 18:12:34 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://93329--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@lahinson lahinson force-pushed the osdocs-12351-etcd-migration-fix-links branch 2 times, most recently from 6a9512d to 3abb409 Compare May 14, 2025 01:32
@lahinson lahinson force-pushed the osdocs-12351-etcd-migration-fix-links branch from 3abb409 to e7d7581 Compare May 14, 2025 13:24
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 14, 2025
@lahinson lahinson force-pushed the osdocs-12351-etcd-migration-fix-links branch 2 times, most recently from a07ba7e to 6d1a32d Compare May 14, 2025 13:56
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 14, 2025
@lahinson lahinson force-pushed the osdocs-12351-etcd-migration-fix-links branch 3 times, most recently from 064a779 to b5d50f1 Compare May 14, 2025 15:35
@lahinson lahinson added this to the Planned for 4.19 GA milestone May 14, 2025
@@ -3755,24 +3755,6 @@ Topics:
File: using-the-must-gather-tool
- Name: OADP monitoring
File: oadp-monitoring
- Name: Control plane backup and restore
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sending a DM about removing this content from the backup and restore book.

@lahinson lahinson force-pushed the osdocs-12351-etcd-migration-fix-links branch from b5d50f1 to f26a6c4 Compare May 14, 2025 18:04
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 14, 2025

@lahinson: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@lahinson lahinson added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 14, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label May 15, 2025
@lahinson lahinson changed the title [OSDOCS-12351]: Removing and redirecting etcd backup/restore content [OSDOCS-12351]: Updating xrefs to etcd backup/restore content May 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.19 size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants