-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
[CNV-52364] IBM Z remove tp and update compatibility list #93379
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CNV-52364] IBM Z remove tp and update compatibility list #93379
Conversation
a1b4149
to
fb85de4
Compare
fb85de4
to
a28fd96
Compare
/lgtm |
@nbziouec: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/label peer-review-needed fyi: @ousleyp |
a28fd96
to
e9f965f
Compare
@@ -249,6 +234,8 @@ You can configure one of the following high-availability (HA) options for your c | |||
[NOTE] | |||
==== | |||
In {product-title} clusters installed using installer-provisioned infrastructure and with a properly configured `MachineHealthCheck` resource, if a node fails the machine health check and becomes unavailable to the cluster, it is recycled. What happens next with VMs that ran on the failed node depends on a series of conditions. See xref:../../virt/nodes/virt-node-maintenance.adoc#run-strategies[Run strategies] for more detailed information about the potential outcomes and how run strategies affect those outcomes. | |||
|
|||
Currently, IPI is not supported on {ibm-z-name}. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🤖 [error] RedHat.TermsErrors: Use 'installer-provisioned infrastructure' rather than 'IPI'. For more information, see RedHat.TermsErrors.
/label peer-review-in-progress |
@SNiemann15 just a friendly reminder to squash the PR before sending it for merge review. Otherwise LGTM! |
/remove-label peer-review-needed |
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress |
/label peer-review-done |
e9f965f
to
9654675
Compare
@SNiemann15: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
/label merge-review-needed |
/lgtm |
@nbziouec: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
@lpettyjo: new pull request created: #93490 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Version(s): 4.19+
Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-52364
Link to docs preview: (openshift-enterprise)
https://93379--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/virt/install/preparing-cluster-for-virt.html
QE review:
Additional information: