Skip to content

Move OpenShift ROSA to the new monitoring structure #93486

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

eromanova97
Copy link
Contributor

@eromanova97 eromanova97 commented May 16, 2025

Version(s): main only

Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-1885#

Link to docs preview: https://93486--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa/latest/observability/monitoring/about-ocp-monitoring/about-ocp-monitoring

QE review: n/a

Additional information: All the changes are already approved for OCP. No new content is being added, this is about moving ROSA to new structure so that there do not have to be multiple monitoring doc versions maintained at the same time.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 16, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

🤖 Fri May 16 10:39:53 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://93486--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

@eromanova97
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 16, 2025

@eromanova97: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants