Skip to content

perf: use serial version of eval_eq_sharp_uni and Radix2Bowers #207

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
jonathanpwang merged 2 commits into from
Dec 11, 2025
Merged

perf: use serial version of eval_eq_sharp_uni and Radix2Bowers #207

jonathanpwang merged 2 commits into from
Dec 11, 2025

Conversation

@jonathanpwang
Copy link
Contributor

@jonathanpwang jonathanpwang commented Dec 11, 2025 •
edited
Loading

For small polynomials, it is better to not use rayon at all.

We copy Radix2Bowers from plonky3 and remove the use of p3_maybe_rayon in all codepaths that touch dft and idft.

@jonathanpwang jonathanpwang changed the title perf: eval_eq_sharp_uni should be serial perf: use serial version of eval_eq_sharp_uni and Radix2Bowers Dec 11, 2025
@jonathanpwang jonathanpwang merged commit 872c6e2 into develop-v2 Dec 11, 2025
5 checks passed
@jonathanpwang jonathanpwang deleted the perf/eq-sharp-uni branch December 11, 2025 06:32
jonathanpwang added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2025
@jonathanpwang
perf: use serial version of eval_eq_sharp_uni and Radix2Bowers (#207
5d8c8fa 
)

For small polynomials, it is better to not use rayon at all.

We copy `Radix2Bowers` from plonky3 and remove the use of
`p3_maybe_rayon` in all codepaths that touch `dft` and `idft`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@jonathanpwang