Skip to content

Upgrade dependencies #262

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2025
Merged

Upgrade dependencies #262

merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2025

Conversation

benoit74
Copy link
Collaborator

@benoit74 benoit74 commented May 9, 2025

Upgraded dependencies, and especially widen the beartype allowed range of versions to fetch latest one.

@benoit74 benoit74 self-assigned this May 9, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (001108d) to head (6f45919).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #262   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           41        41           
  Lines         2512      2512           
  Branches       339       339           
=========================================
  Hits          2512      2512           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@benoit74 benoit74 marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2025 12:25
@benoit74 benoit74 requested a review from rgaudin May 9, 2025 12:25
@benoit74
Copy link
Collaborator Author

benoit74 commented May 9, 2025

@rgaudin is there any specific reason you pinned beartype to a single version in the past? is it ok to widen this?

@benoit74 benoit74 added this to the 5.2.0 milestone May 9, 2025
@benoit74
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@rgaudin up ^^

@benoit74 benoit74 merged commit cc017df into main May 13, 2025
9 checks passed
@benoit74 benoit74 deleted the upgrade_deps branch May 13, 2025 07:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants