Skip to content

Conversation

OchiengEd
Copy link

Add Operator Framework chairs.

@OchiengEd OchiengEd requested a review from a team as a code owner August 13, 2025 14:08
Signed-off-by: Edmund Ochieng <[email protected]>
Copy link

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@kevinrizza @joelanford @trgeiger @grokspawn @metacosm

We are adding here now for we have a place where the chair is
We had not had it before

So, I am OK with it. If we found a better way, we can always add a follow-up to include this information.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 13, 2025
@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member

This seems reasonable to me. But, right now, we keep track of the list of working group governance in the readme in this repo:

https://github.com/operator-framework/community/blob/master/README.md#working-groups

Should we just do it there? That list is also pretty out of date and probably needs to be updated as well, while we're at it

@camilamacedo86
Copy link

Hi @kevinrizza

https://github.com/operator-framework/community/blob/master/README.md#working-groups

It seems quite outdated, so I’ll follow up on this and take action to update it.

Comment on lines 5 to 11
* Joe Lanford (**[@joelanford](https://github.com/joelanford)**)
* Camila Macedo (**[@camilamacedo86](https://github.com/camilamacedo86)**)
* Jordan Keister (**[@grokspawn](https://github.com/grokspawn)**)
* Attila Mészáros (**[@csviri](https://github.com/csviri)**)
* Kevin Rizza (**[@kevinrizza](https://github.com/kevinrizza)**)
* Christophe LAPRUN (**[@metacosm](https://github.com/metacosm)**)
* Tayler Geiger (**[@trgeiger](https://github.com/trgeiger)**)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we alpha-sort these, unless we're also trying to express tenure/seniority? (And add a note to line 3 that they are in alpha ordered.) AFAIK there is no other ranking.

Copy link

@grokspawn grokspawn Aug 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: I'm drafting a PR to update the maintainers list for CNCF org, and in it I did keep Joe first, just because I was maintaining the convention.
See cncf/foundation#1100

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think no criteria was used to order
if so I go always with alphabetic
Anyway, I am OK with any.

Co-authored-by: Chris Laprun <[email protected]>
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants