Add script for running JET with options

[fingolfin]

Specifically, don't report anythin related to our unholy
is_loaded_directly hack. We know it's evil, no need to see
JET get twisted up about it.

Similar scripts could / should be add to our other packages,
with possible more things to ignore added for each, as needed.

The AnyFrameMethod could also perhaps be submitted to JET,
dunno if there'd be interest.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.40%. Comparing base (a9fbc57) to head (e994993).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1312   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.40%   76.40%           
=======================================
  Files          61       61           
  Lines        4945     4945           
=======================================
  Hits         3778     3778           
  Misses       1167     1167           

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[lgoettgens]

If it helps you, please add it. I haven't looked at JET reports in a while.

[lgoettgens]

The AnyFrameMethod could also perhaps be submitted to JET,
dunno if there'd be interest.

It would make sense to at least try it

[lgoettgens]

Side-remark: When looking at a JET report, I just got two potential issues related to is_loaded_directly. One of them will be fixed by Nemocas/AbstractAlgebra.jl#2277, the other one is something genuine in julia Base (about show(io::IOContext{IOBuffer}, frame::Base.StackTraces.StackFrame)). Therefore, I would be interested if there are any more popping up for you (and with which combination of versions of julia and packages).

[lgoettgens]

the other one is something genuine in julia Base (about show(io::IOContext{IOBuffer}, frame::Base.StackTraces.StackFrame)

Will be fixed by JuliaLang/julia#60645

With these things fixed, do we then really need this script?

[fingolfin]

We don't need the script for this usecase, but I'd like to keep it around for the time being because it can be very helpful for ignoring things, so one can focus on what really matters.

Also, I'll try to submit the code to JET.

Anyway, let's keep this around for a bit (so I don't loose it / forget it)