Skip to content

Make the SPDX 3 package manager use the dependency handler#11748

Draft
sschuberth wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
spdx-dependency-handler
Draft

Make the SPDX 3 package manager use the dependency handler#11748
sschuberth wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
spdx-dependency-handler

Conversation

@sschuberth

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Please have a look at the individual commit messages for the details.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sebastian@doubleopen.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sebastian@doubleopen.org>
Use their conjunction instead to be conservative. While at it, improve
the message to contain the precise SPDX ID.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sebastian@doubleopen.org>
Avoid most name collisions between source and install packages by adding
special logic to derive the name and version from the SPDX ID for the
former.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sebastian@doubleopen.org>
Instead of the older "dependency tree" approach, use the newer "dependency
graph" to manage dependencies (see #3825 for context).

This requires rewriting large parts of the dependency handling, which
implicitly fixes #11647.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Schuberth <sebastian@doubleopen.org>
import org.spdx.library.model.v3_0_1.software.SpdxPackage as SpdxPackage
import org.spdx.storage.simple.InMemSpdxStore
import org.spdx.v3jsonldstore.JsonLDStore
import kotlin.jvm.optionals.getOrDefault
import org.ossreviewtoolkit.utils.common.enumSetOf
import org.ossreviewtoolkit.utils.common.withoutPrefix
import org.ossreviewtoolkit.utils.spdx.toExpression
import org.ossreviewtoolkit.utils.spdx.toSpdx
Comment on lines +86 to +89
relationshipsByTarget[spdxId]?.forEach { rel ->
println(rel.from!!.objectUri + " --- ${rel.relationshipType} --> " + spdxId)
whatLeadsTo(rel.from!!.objectUri, path + rel.from!!.objectUri)
}
return path
}

fun whatLeadsTo(spdxId: String): List<String> =
// a distinguishing name based on the ID.
?: dependency.primaryPurpose.getOrNull()?.takeIf { it == SoftwarePurpose.SOURCE }
?.let { dependency.getOrtIdFromSpdxId() } ?: Identifier(
type = PACKAGE_TYPE_SPDX,
?.let { dependency.getOrtIdFromSpdxId() } ?: Identifier(
type = PACKAGE_TYPE_SPDX,
namespace = "",
name = dependency.name.get(),
type = PACKAGE_TYPE_SPDX,
namespace = "",
name = dependency.name.get(),
version = dependency.packageVersion.getOrDefault("")
namespace = "",
name = dependency.name.get(),
version = dependency.packageVersion.getOrDefault("")
)

override fun dependenciesFor(dependency: SpdxPackage): List<SpdxPackage> =
getElementsReferredFrom(dependency, RelationshipType.DEPENDS_ON).filterIsInstance<SpdxPackage>() +
getElementsReferredFrom(dependency, RelationshipType.HAS_OPTIONAL_DEPENDENCY).filterIsInstance<SpdxPackage>() +
override fun dependenciesFor(dependency: SpdxPackage): List<SpdxPackage> =
getElementsReferredFrom(dependency, RelationshipType.DEPENDS_ON).filterIsInstance<SpdxPackage>() +
getElementsReferredFrom(dependency, RelationshipType.HAS_OPTIONAL_DEPENDENCY).filterIsInstance<SpdxPackage>() +
getElementsReferredFrom(dependency, RelationshipType.HAS_PROVIDED_DEPENDENCY).filterIsInstance<SpdxPackage>()
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.31%. Comparing base (20c1fd8) to head (b3b95c5).
⚠️ Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##               main   #11748   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage     58.31%   58.31%           
  Complexity     1760     1760           
=========================================
  Files           356      356           
  Lines         13258    13258           
  Branches       1314     1314           
=========================================
  Hits           7731     7731           
  Misses         5039     5039           
  Partials        488      488           
Flag Coverage Δ
funTest-external-tools 14.65% <ø> (ø)
test-ubuntu-24.04 41.84% <ø> (ø)
test-windows-2025 41.82% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants