Skip to content

Fix/ocisdev 1433 - #13020

Draft
2403905 wants to merge 6 commits into
stable-8.0from
fix/OCISDEV-1433
Draft

2403905 wants to merge 6 commits into
stable-8.0from
fix/OCISDEV-1433

Conversation

@2403905

@2403905 2403905 commented Sep 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Related Issue

  • Fixes <issue_link>

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

  • test environment:
  • test case 1:
  • test case 2:
  • ...

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation ticket raised:

@kw-security

kw-security commented Sep 28, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

✅ Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
✅ Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
✅ Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
✅ Code Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

2403905 and others added 3 commits September 29, 2026 12:22
The setting closed healthy grpc connections on a timer so that clients would redo
their DNS lookup. It never helped against the failure it was reached for - a
connection whose peer stopped answering - because the age limit is enforced by
the server, the grace period was left at infinity so a request already in flight
was never ended, and any value without a unit suffix silently disabled it again.

Detecting a peer that stops answering is now the job of the grpc clients, which
ping the peer while a request is in flight. The servers here got the matching
enforcement policy so they accept those pings; the client side arrives with the
next reva bump.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…TION that disable the resolution of public link shares when answering PROPFIND requests.

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants