fix(parser): report syntax error for new super()

[Boshen]

Summary

• Report a syntax error for new super() per the ECMAScript spec grammar
• MemberExpression includes SuperProperty (super.x, super[x]) but NOT bare super, so new super() is invalid
• new super.method() and new super[x]() remain valid

Closes #20306

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR updates the JS parser to reject new super() as a syntax error (per ECMAScript grammar), while keeping new super.prop() / new super[prop]() valid. It also adds coverage input to ensure the invalid form is exercised by the coverage suite.

Changes:

• Add a parser check that emits a diagnostic when a new expression’s callee is a bare super.
• Introduce a dedicated diagnostic for the new super() case.
• Add a new misc/fail coverage case for new super();.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
tasks/coverage/misc/fail/new-super.js	Adds a failing coverage input for new super();.
crates/oxc_parser/src/js/expression.rs	Emits an error when parsing new expressions whose callee is Expression::Super.
crates/oxc_parser/src/diagnostics.rs	Adds a new diagnostic constructor for the new super() error.

---

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 53 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 3 skipped benchmarks¹

---

_{Comparing fix/new-super-syntax-error (686bdca) with main (e62524d)}

Footnotes

1. 3 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

[Boshen]

Merge activity

• Mar 15, 1:53 AM UTC: The merge label '0-merge' was detected. This PR will be added to the Graphite merge queue once it meets the requirements.
• Mar 15, 2:01 AM UTC: Boshen added this pull request to the Graphite merge queue.