Skip to content

Conversation

@ccasin
Copy link
Contributor

@ccasin ccasin commented May 10, 2025

This is a bugfix release that doesn't affect type checking, so the only expected changes are magic number bumps.

@liam923
Copy link
Contributor

liam923 commented Jun 2, 2025

@d-kalinichenko I don't follow the latter two commits on this PR

@liam923
Copy link
Contributor

liam923 commented Jun 2, 2025

I'm reverting commits c8640ad and 689aabf since a) I don't understand the need for them, b) @d-kalinichenko and @ccasin are ooo this week and hence are unable to explain then, and c) 333038c is the version we currently have imported into our internal codebase. I'll merge if CI passes. Once you two are back, we can discuss those two commits and potentially open a separate PR with just them.

@ccasin
Copy link
Contributor Author

ccasin commented Jun 2, 2025

I don't recognize those commits, and reverting them sounds plausible to me

@liam923 liam923 merged commit ed68782 into main Jun 3, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@dkalinichenko-js
Copy link
Contributor

Those commits were needed for OxCaml and are unnecessary internally, let's discuss this later.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants