Fix other glibc minimum version#19
Merged
Merged
Conversation
There's a separate default glibc version in `cargo-dist-schema` that we missed in 5952e45 (Update minimum glibc version, 2025-06-17). Update this as well, and correct the comment at the other site as well.
`install_path_fallback_to_cargo_home` is expected to panic, so its snapshot is never read. Remove the unused snapshot.
wfchandler
force-pushed
the
wc/more-platform
branch
from
June 19, 2025 03:17
ebfd57d to
32b2659
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Build with v1.0.1
Remove snap for fallback test
install_path_fallback_to_cargo_homeis expected to panic, so itssnapshot is never read.
Remove the unused snapshot.
Fix other glibc minimum version
There's a separate default glibc version in
cargo-dist-schemathat wemissed in
5952e45 (Update minimum glibc version, 2025-06-17).
Update this as well, and correct the comment at the other site as well.