Skip to content

Conversation

@nforro
Copy link
Member

@nforro nforro commented Dec 11, 2024

fedora-stable-aarch64 should be sufficient for container image builds, but perhaps it would make more sense to use fedora-all-aarch64 in jobs where we already build for fedora-all? WDYT?

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded.
https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/packit-service/buildset/36695d71d26b4f4f85d00c0be8b58b3c

✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 2m 12s
✔️ specfile-tests-rpm-deps SUCCESS in 1m 17s
✔️ specfile-tests-pip-deps SUCCESS in 1m 11s

Signed-off-by: Nikola Forró <[email protected]>
@nforro
Copy link
Member Author

nforro commented Dec 11, 2024

Ok, I've changed the chroots to match, and let's enable ppc64le when it's needed, to avoid potential long queues in Copr.

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded.
https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/packit-service/buildset/b80155ab2c514974bbd799ff7210bd67

✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 2m 09s
✔️ specfile-tests-rpm-deps SUCCESS in 1m 11s
✔️ specfile-tests-pip-deps SUCCESS in 1m 09s

@nforro
Copy link
Member Author

nforro commented Dec 11, 2024

/packit retest-failed

@nforro nforro added the mergeit Merge via Zuul label Dec 11, 2024
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

@nforro
Copy link
Member Author

nforro commented Dec 11, 2024

regate

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded (gate pipeline).
https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/packit-service/buildset/34546bba466c438aa11104c0e4923e35

✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 53s

@softwarefactory-project-zuul softwarefactory-project-zuul bot merged commit ecdb644 into main Dec 11, 2024
36 checks passed
@nforro nforro deleted the aarch64 branch December 11, 2024 12:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

mergeit Merge via Zuul

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants