Fix typos #489
Fix typos #489
Conversation
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @jessp01, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses and corrects several typographical errors found within the project's documentation, code comments, and string literals. The changes are purely cosmetic, aiming to improve clarity and maintain consistency in the project's written content, thereby enhancing overall code quality and readability.
Highlights
- Documentation and Comment Clarity: Corrected various spelling errors across documentation files, code comments, and string literals to improve readability and accuracy.
- Code Quality Improvement: Enhanced the overall textual quality of the codebase by addressing minor typographical inconsistencies.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request addresses several typos across documentation, comments, and docstrings. All the corrections are accurate and improve the overall quality and professionalism of the codebase. The suggestion to incorporate an automated typo checker like crate-ci/typos into the CI/CD pipeline is excellent and highly recommended to prevent similar issues in the future. The changes are good to merge.
|
Build succeeded. ✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 56s |
We already use pre-commit so GH action is not needed, just a config update.
That would be great, thanks! |
|
Build succeeded (gate pipeline). ✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 51s |
softwarefactory-project-zuul
bot
merged commit a67a342
into
packit:main
2 participants
Fix typos in docs and comments.
May I also recommend the use of https://github.com/crate-ci/typos/blob/master/docs/pre-commit.md and https://github.com/crate-ci/typos/blob/master/docs/github-action.md to prevent future occurrences? :)
Happy to submit a pull for these if you'd like.