Skip to content

Conversation

@jessp01
Copy link
Contributor

@jessp01 jessp01 commented Oct 16, 2025

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @jessp01, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request improves the project's README.md by integrating essential badges for continuous integration status, documentation links, and license information. These additions aim to enhance the project's visibility and provide immediate access to key resources for users and contributors.

Highlights

  • README Enhancements: Added CI, documentation, and license badges to the README.md file to provide quick visual status and access to important project information.
  • Badge Definitions: Included the necessary Markdown link definitions for the newly added badges at the end of the README.md.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds CI, documentation, and license badges to the README.md file, which is a great addition for project visibility. The implementation is correct. I have one suggestion to improve the maintainability of the new badge reference links by reordering them.

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Gemini code assist claims that this makes a difference and rates it as "moderate"; I don't think it really matters in this case, but whatever... it does no harm, either.

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Comment on lines +318 to +323
[badge-build]: https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/api/tenant/packit-service/badge?project=packit/specfile&pipeline=check
[build]: https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/packit-service/buildsets?project=packit%2Fspecfile&pipeline=check&skip=0
[docs-badge]: https://img.shields.io/badge/documentation-3572A5
[docs]: https://packit.dev/specfile/api/specfile
[badge-license]: https://img.shields.io/github/license/packit/specfile.svg
[license]: ./LICENSE
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi!
Thanks for adding the links. The Github preview doesn't show these. Could you investigate further?
Thank you.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok these are not supposed to be seen 😅

Copy link
Contributor Author

@jessp01 jessp01 Oct 21, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @majamassarini ,

Ok these are not supposed to be seen 😅

Sorry, not sure I understand what you mean by the above? These URLs are used in the top lines of the README:

[![CI][badge-build]][build]
[![Documentation][docs-badge]][docs]
[![License][badge-license]][license]

It's standard practice when it comes to badges, makes it easier to read and alter.

Copy link
Member

@majamassarini majamassarini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@majamassarini
Copy link
Member

recheck

@softwarefactory-project-zuul
Copy link
Contributor

Build succeeded.
https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/packit-service/buildset/8a9ad5b6e3964a5297b91aaaf876550c

✔️ pre-commit SUCCESS in 1m 56s
✔️ specfile-tests-rpm-deps SUCCESS in 1m 46s
✔️ specfile-tests-pip-deps SUCCESS in 1m 43s

@majamassarini majamassarini merged commit c266087 into packit:main Oct 27, 2025
46 of 48 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from new to done in Packit Kanban Board Oct 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants