docs(run): §7 report — clean-room root-caused, 11 PRs unstranded - #3310
Conversation
APR-RELEASE-001 §7. The interval's two mechanisms, both of the
declared-fix-that-cannot-fire class:
* cargo publish strips path-only dev-deps, and aprender-compute's src/ named
three of them -- 8 consecutive red clean-room runs, two releases shipped
over the hard gate.
* a .gitattributes merge driver is read from the side being merged INTO, so
the union declaration from #3256 never fired on any older branch.
Records what is NOT claimed: the A1 half of #3189 stays unreproduced, and the
command that would settle it is named.
Pmat-Ticket: PMAT-3305
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
PR-1's premise held and widened: 355 tests dark, and the make target that would have run them errored, which is why nobody noticed. PR-2 named 14 anonymous obligations and repointed 4 proofs that referenced nothing -- then the scan showed 824 of 876 contracts carry the same defect, so #3091's "0/17 bound" was never a Qwen finding. Records the judgement call on KANI-QHF-001 as a decision request rather than burying it, and the staging-contracts hazard that was deliberately not actioned. Pmat-Ticket: PMAT-3305 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…gations named Leads with the scope line: GDN 0/5 discharged (5 obligations, 5 tests, all ignored with empty bodies), #3303 not started, andon clock stated. Records that pv proof-status reports L4 for a contract whose every test is an empty stub, and that two of my own changes were caught by the repo's guards rather than by me. Pmat-Ticket: PMAT-3305 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
§13.11 rung 1 — quorum shadow verdict Shadow mode: this records a verdict and merges nothing. A refusal |
…3303 blocker named The scope line now carries the #3303 blocker with its number, as ruled. Records the two P0·Instrument rules (sampling window >= p95 gate; BEHIND=0 without group batching pays the burst all at once), and the census gate catching my own naming widening duplicate-stem drift. Pmat-Ticket: PMAT-3305 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
§7 interval — 18:04Z (posted as a comment: this PR is in the merge queue, which locks its branch)§8 decisions, logged not asked
infra#612 — implemented, verifying before PRSplit by tree shape, budget cap 60 GB, 24 consecutive skips → exit 3, ledger at Coordination
Filed this interval: aprender#3329 (pin bump), aprender#3330 (row-0a instrument refuses every c=1 lane at both pins). |
§7 interval — 18:30Z§8 decisions, logged
Shipped / opened this interval
|
§7 interval — 19:18Z§8 decisions, logged
#3041 — split plan (#3334)96 files: 42 already identical on main (#3004 registry, #3026 parity), 20 differ only because R-0b is behind, and 1 is a contract main deleted on purpose. Recommendation: close with a 33-file residual, cut fresh from main; the mechanical and contract slices come out empty after a trial merge. Coordinationinfra-0b was messaged before the gx10 reaper apply, as agreed: |
§7 interval — 19:58ZLanded / armed since the last interval
Red, with the cause read from the log (not the step name)
§8 decision, loggedgx10 / yoga reaper deploy: a blanket |
§7 interval — 21:36ZMoved since the last interval
§8 decisions, logged
|
§7 interval — 2026-09-15T22:24ZLanded / deployed
pv chain (re-verified by the orchestrator)
Correction to the previous intervalDecision 2 there ("the generator bug is fixed in #3320 before it lands") is withdrawn on measurement. On the 34 citations that already had ids, no binding rule scores 100% (position 33/34, type+ordinal 1/34). Naming also reduced dangling citations (576 on main → 497), so #3320 lands unchanged. Ids are names and stay stable; the citations are what gets repaired. Red, with cause
|
§7 interval — 2026-09-16T05:35Z0.68 scope (operator ask, done this interval)The repo has no per-release label — milestone 0.68.0 (ms#5, due 2026-09-15, already overdue) is the release scope. Qwen3.5 was already on it (#3091, #3114, #3303); the rest of this train's work had fallen off it, so #3320, #3331, #3340, #3297, #3313, #3318, #3321, #3324, #3325, #3328, #3329, #3330, #3332, #3334, #3335, #3336, #3337, #3338 are now on 0.68.0, and new PRs are filed onto it as they open. This is release scoping, not the CI label edits the standing rule forbids. Landed / open
Red, with cause read from the log
|
§7 interval — 2026-09-16T06:15ZThe train is blocked on ONE thing, and it is on main
That is not a PR defect — every open PR inherits it through guard-tree. It is also the guard being right: two instruments cannot be compared. #3291 already records that the fleet declares 3.40.1 while aprender's pins say 3.40.0 and A worker is measuring pmat on every host and in the CI image first, then restamping by re-measuring, never by editing a number: any baseline value that moves is a ticket, not a restamp. Converge, prove, then move the assertion. Opened / fixed this interval
0.68 scope (operator ask) — doneMilestone 0.68.0 is the release scope; the repo has no per-release label. 19 items of this train were off it and are now on it, all 13 unlabeled 0.68 issues now carry a type label, and every PR opened since is filed onto 0.68.0 at creation. Qwen3.5 is on it: #3091, #3114, #3303, #3320, #3331, #3340. |
§7 correction — two claims from the last interval are WITHDRAWNBoth were falsified by workers who checked the premise instead of executing it. Recording them here because both were published above. 1. "The train is blocked on main" — WRONG. Main is green; this workstation is drifted.I read
Two consequences worth recording. 2. "E2E 3/7 + 4 N/A pending the schema" — WRONG. None of the four is a device claim.The contract says so, and the contract wins:
All four are CPU-decidable. Declaring them N/A would have moved obligations out of the unproved column without proving anything — the exact laundering the N/A rules were written to prevent, applied to the ticket that wrote them. Zero N/A declarations were made. The real root cause is that this contract binds 0 of 6 obligations to a test. Lane B is re-scoped to that: write the four tests, tighten QE2E-BND-002's The scope line should read E2E 3/7, 4 provable on CPU and unbound — not "4 N/A". |
§7 interval — 2026-09-16T07:17ZEvery red on the board was read from its log, and each had a different cause
Corrections — three claims of mine withdrawn
Filed
0.68Milestone 0.68.0 carries this train: 19 items added, all 13 unlabeled issues typed, every new PR filed onto it at creation. Qwen3.5 is on it. |
§7 interval — 2026-09-16T08:13ZWhat that measurement found on the way
QE2E-INV-001 is still not asserted, and the range was not widened. P(9B) moves 8.209B → 8.345B, still 0.655B below [9.0B, 9.2B], and the 9b descriptor contradicts itself: Open PRs, all armed, all filed on 0.68.0
Honest counters, not flattering ones
|
§7 interval — 2026-09-16T09:13ZRuling 1 — ms#5 retargeted, mechanically, no discretion296 open items were on 0.68.0. Kept: #3091, #3208, #3114, #3331 (#3303 and #3335 are closed/merged, and PR3 joins when it opens). Everything else moved by label: P0/P1 → 0.69.0 (61), everything else → 0.70.0 (231), 0 failures. 0.68.0 now reads as the Qwen3.5 CPU floor, so "overdue by a day" measures the real critical path. Ruling 3 — clean-room-on-tag is now a gate, not a runbook linepaiml/infra#622 is open (closes infra#621), and it is the durable fix:
Three measurements decided it: It also caught the consumer that would have broken at T-4: Reaper: applied to all three, per the ruling
Two findings from doing it, filed in infra: |
§7 interval — 2026-09-16T09:32ZReaper: applied to all three, and the apply found the defect that mattered
It was not hung — it was deleting a per-PR registry copy every ~6.5 s until SIGTERM. 183 copies wait on intel (12 on gx10, 7 on yoga), so one rule needs ~20 min against a 10-min unit budget: the run is killed inside it, every rule after it has never run there, and the escalation is blind on the host that needs it most. paiml/infra#627 is open (closes infra#626): the sweep is budgeted and resumable rather than given a bigger timeout — a bigger timeout was rejected because the script holds a Also filed from the same apply: infra#625 — Also filed#3353 — |
§7 interval — 2026-09-16T09:48ZReaper ledger: 2 of 3, and the third is diagnosed, not unknownThe operator asked for ledger records on all three. Measured just now:
intel is the one that cannot write it, for the reason already measured: 183 per-PR registry copies at ~6.5 s each is ~20 min of work against a 10-min unit budget, so the run is SIGTERM'd inside one rule and Fleet risk worth naming: gx10 is reclaiming slower than CI consumesgx10's own ledger line from 09:46 reads Since the last interval
|
§7 interval — 2026-09-16T10:17ZCorrection: my gx10 diagnosis was wrong, and the intake was mineI reported the reaper as "losing a race" — reclaiming 2.2 GB per run while intake outpaced it. infra-0b measured it properly and that framing does not survive:
This is admission control, not a reaper defect. paiml/infra#627 correctly does not address it. What I did about it, in my own lane
All three PR reds were the disk, not the code
Filed / open from thispaiml/infra#628 carries three real measurement defects found on the way, none of which is today's cause and the body says so: |
§7 interval — 2026-09-16T10:45Zgx10: 0 → 153 GB free, and the fix was mine to makeThe host hit 0 bytes at 10:16Z and was killing critical-path jobs. Recovery, in order:
infra-0b's measurement corrected mine and is worth recording: the reaper was never losing a race — its 09:52Z pass logged The reaper is deployed to all three — and could not take effect
paiml/infra#629 is open with the fix, and the sweep found far more than the one resource I filed: 35 activation checks across 6 configs were blind to unit content — they asked only loaded/enabled/active, all of which stay true when the unit body changes. Three intel tasks had no That is the third and fourth instance in 24 hours of a number that cannot go red — after the fail-open Consequence for the operator's "ledger records for all three": gx10 95 lines, yoga 2, intel still ABSENT — and it will stay absent until #629 lands, because intel's fix lives in the unit env that never loaded. I am not hand-running Infra board#622 MERGED (clean-room |
§7 interval — 2026-09-16T11:19ZLedger records for all three — SATISFIED, and the evidence is better than the status lineintel wrote its first ledger line at 11:07:19Z. Not because #632 landed (it has not), but because #627's budgets carry script-level defaults — The line itself is #627's design working end to end: {"ts":"2026-09-16T11:07:19Z","host":"mac-server","free_gb_before":870,"free_gb_after":1005,
"swept":30,"reclaimed_bytes":56731312299,"reason":"partial: 105 unit(s) and 0 step(s) deferred"}It stopped cleanly at its budget, recorded what it left, and reclaimed 56.7 GB — where the same host was previously SIGTERM'd mid-sweep and recorded nothing. Current: intel 1, gx10 101, yoga 3. #632 is still correct and still worth landing — 35 activation checks blind to unit content is a defect either way — but it is no longer what gates this line. PR1 is wedged on a run that never dispatched a job
Consequence: both required contexts ( Cancel + rerun did not re-dispatch, so I am minting a fresh event. Recording the shape because it is a trap with a force-push in any rebase-onto-main flow, which is exactly what a squash-merged stack requires. |
1 participant
APR-RELEASE-001 §7 interval report for the 2026-09-15 autonomous run.
Two mechanisms this interval, both of the declared fix that cannot fire class:
cargo publishstrips path-only dev-deps, andaprender-compute/src/named three of them — 8 consecutive red clean-room runs, and v0.66.0 and v0.67.0 both shipped over the hard gate. Fixed in fix(publish): aprender-compute used four dev-deps that cargo publish deletes — clean-room red 8/8 #3307, guard + baseline in the same PR..gitattributesmerge driver is read from the side being merged into, sodocs/audits/*.jsonl merge=unionfrom fix(git): a resolution that is always the same is a merge driver nobody wrote #3256 never fired on any branch older than it. Fixed in fix(git): a merge driver declared after a branch was cut never fires on it #3309.Also records what is not claimed: the A1 half of #3189 — "the clean-room gate cannot pass on a release commit at all" — stays unreproduced, with the command that would settle it named. #3305 explains all 11 observed errors and none is release-shaped.
Docs-only; no code, no roadmap change.
ont-delta: none this interval produced no ontology row — the two findings are merge-path and publish-manifest mechanisms, both already tracked as #3305/#3306/#3308
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
no-close: this is the §7 interval report. It cites #3189, #3305, #3306 and #3308 as the findings it records; each is closed by its own PR, and a docs report closes nothing.