[docs] Add AutoAgent production-gate evidence checklist#4443
[docs] Add AutoAgent production-gate evidence checklist#4443willblanchard wants to merge 2 commits intopaperclipai:masterfrom
Conversation
|
@Praviwwattshift please review PR #4443 when you have a chance. CEO attempted the formal reviewer request, but both the GitHub connector and Readiness state at request time:
Maintainer action still needed: formally request Pravin as reviewer, or have Pravin review directly from this mention once |
Greptile SummaryThis docs-only PR adds a production-gate evidence checklist for AutoAgent review handoffs and links it from the execution-policy and comments-and-communication guides. The content and structure are clear, but the PR description is missing the required Thinking Path and Model Used sections mandated by
Confidence Score: 4/5Safe to merge after fixing the broken Jira link and adding the required PR description sections. One P1 finding (likely-broken internal Jira link in published docs) and two required PR-description sections missing per CONTRIBUTING.md (Thinking Path, Model Used) keep this from a 5. All other changes are straightforward docs additions with correct relative paths. docs/guides/board-operator/production-gate-evidence.md — Jira link on line 10 needs to be a full URL or plain text. Important Files Changed
Prompt To Fix All With AIThis is a comment left during a code review.
Path: docs/guides/board-operator/production-gate-evidence.md
Line: 10
Comment:
**Internal Jira link may not resolve in published docs**
The link `[WAT-1793](/WAT/issues/WAT-1793)` uses an absolute path that is unlikely to resolve in a Mintlify-hosted docs site. If this Jira project isn't publicly accessible or the docs host doesn't proxy `/WAT/...`, readers will hit a 404. Either replace it with the full Jira URL (e.g. `https://paperclip.atlassian.net/browse/WAT-1793`) or remove the hyperlink and leave the ticket ID as plain text.
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.
---
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: docs/guides/board-operator/production-gate-evidence.md
Line: 1
Comment:
**PR description is missing required sections per CONTRIBUTING.md**
`CONTRIBUTING.md` requires every PR to include a **Thinking Path** (explaining the reasoning from project context down to this specific change) and a **Model Used** section (listing the AI model or "None — human-authored"). The current description has a Summary and Validation block but is missing both of these required sections. Please add them before merging.
**Context Used:** CONTRIBUTING.md has a guide for a good PR message ... ([source](https://app.greptile.com/review/custom-context?memory=instruction-0))
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "docs: add production gate evidence check..." | Re-trigger Greptile |
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
|
||
| This checklist comes from the fake-pass risk audit in [WAT-1793](/WAT/issues/WAT-1793). It is intentionally stricter than normal progress comments: a production gate can pass only when the evidence shows the real production path, complete inputs, persisted outputs, and independent review. | ||
|
|
||
| ## Required Evidence |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The link [WAT-1793](/WAT/issues/WAT-1793) uses an absolute path that is unlikely to resolve in a Mintlify-hosted docs site. If this Jira project isn't publicly accessible or the docs host doesn't proxy /WAT/..., readers will hit a 404. Either replace it with the full Jira URL (e.g. https://paperclip.atlassian.net/browse/WAT-1793) or remove the hyperlink and leave the ticket ID as plain text.
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: docs/guides/board-operator/production-gate-evidence.md
Line: 10
Comment:
**Internal Jira link may not resolve in published docs**
The link `[WAT-1793](/WAT/issues/WAT-1793)` uses an absolute path that is unlikely to resolve in a Mintlify-hosted docs site. If this Jira project isn't publicly accessible or the docs host doesn't proxy `/WAT/...`, readers will hit a 404. Either replace it with the full Jira URL (e.g. `https://paperclip.atlassian.net/browse/WAT-1793`) or remove the hyperlink and leave the ticket ID as plain text.
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.| @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ | |||
| --- | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
CONTRIBUTING.md requires every PR to include a Thinking Path (explaining the reasoning from project context down to this specific change) and a Model Used section (listing the AI model or "None — human-authored"). The current description has a Summary and Validation block but is missing both of these required sections. Please add them before merging.
Context Used: CONTRIBUTING.md has a guide for a good PR message ... (source)
Prompt To Fix With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: docs/guides/board-operator/production-gate-evidence.md
Line: 1
Comment:
**PR description is missing required sections per CONTRIBUTING.md**
`CONTRIBUTING.md` requires every PR to include a **Thinking Path** (explaining the reasoning from project context down to this specific change) and a **Model Used** section (listing the AI model or "None — human-authored"). The current description has a Summary and Validation block but is missing both of these required sections. Please add them before merging.
**Context Used:** CONTRIBUTING.md has a guide for a good PR message ... ([source](https://app.greptile.com/review/custom-context?memory=instruction-0))
How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.
|
Addressed Greptile findings on head |
1 participant
Thinking Path
What Changed
Verification
git diff --checknode -e "JSON.parse(require('fs').readFileSync('docs/docs.json','utf8')); console.log('docs/docs.json valid')"pnpm run check:tokensRisks
Model Used
Checklist
Paperclip