Skip to content

Conversation

@georgepisaltu
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@dmitry-markin dmitry-markin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't really understand the bridging stuff — should it be reverted to use polkadot instead of rococo before the mainnet launch? I.e., we use this code for a testnet, but later move from rococo to polkadot?

@antkve
Copy link
Contributor

antkve commented Jul 7, 2025

I.e., we use this code for a testnet, but later move from rococo to polkadot?

Yes that's pretty much it

@dmitry-markin dmitry-markin merged commit 7d5e548 into main Jul 7, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
@dmitry-markin dmitry-markin deleted the george-update branch July 7, 2025 13:13
mudigal added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 30, 2026
- Add authorize_account_for_size() convenience method that estimates and authorizes in one call
- Add signer_account() method to TransactionSubmitter trait to derive account from signer
- Update AsyncBulletinClient to automatically use signer's account if not explicitly set
- Clarify authorization documentation: mention Root/sudo requirement and no fees
- Clarify estimate_authorization helper purpose in docs

Addresses franciscoaguirre's comments:
- Comment #15: API that calls estimation underneath
- Comments #16/#17: Get account from keypair/signer automatically
- Comment #11: Clarify 'required values' in authorization docs
- Comment #14: Mention Root requirement and no fees for authorization
x3c41a pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 1, 2026
- Add authorize_account_for_size() convenience method that estimates and authorizes in one call
- Add signer_account() method to TransactionSubmitter trait to derive account from signer
- Update AsyncBulletinClient to automatically use signer's account if not explicitly set
- Clarify authorization documentation: mention Root/sudo requirement and no fees
- Clarify estimate_authorization helper purpose in docs

Addresses franciscoaguirre's comments:
- Comment #15: API that calls estimation underneath
- Comments #16/#17: Get account from keypair/signer automatically
- Comment #11: Clarify 'required values' in authorization docs
- Comment #14: Mention Root requirement and no fees for authorization
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants