Add feature flag support for Rococo vs Polkadot (init) #35
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
antkve
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2025
dmitry-markin
approved these changes
Aug 1, 2025
Contributor
dmitry-markin
left a comment
dmitry-markin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code-wise looks good, but I don't know enough to check the business logic.
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit: Is this file actually used anywhere?
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't know, we will clean this up in #22
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes: #26
For some time, we need to support both bridges in a single runtime (Rococo testnet, Polkadot production).