-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
[benchmarking-cli] Add --keys-limit=Option<usize> and --random-seed=Option<u64>
#10884
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
arturgontijo
wants to merge
6
commits into
paritytech:master
Choose a base branch
from
moonbeam-foundation:artur/bench-keys-limit
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+139
−24
Open
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
407791a
add cli param keys_limit
librelois f427cd3
add --random-seed param
librelois ed30217
Format
arturgontijo 35837c3
Circle back and take more keys if necessary.
arturgontijo 6ed88c4
Add select_entries() to avoid code dup.
arturgontijo 6960e54
fmt
arturgontijo File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If there are not
keys_limitkeys behindfirst_keythis will "break". We should instead just load all the keys and then dosample_iter.This can then directly replace the
shufflecall below.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
sample_iterseems to create new values (IIUC). What if we usechoose_multiplehere?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah you can also use
choose_multiple.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @bkchr, after discussing with the team loading all keys is exactly what breaks (OOM) the workflow for our huge storage chains.
But we get your
first_keyconcern...let me try a different approach here and will ping you back.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bkchr just pushed a new approach to get more keys when it is necessary.
LMK what do you think about it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@arturgontijo I'm fine with the approach, but can we get this into some shared function? :D
It can probably take two lambdas to abstract the different ways to read the entries.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add a shared function in 6ed88c4
I tried to simplify it even more but the complexity (mostly trait bounds) was getting too high.