[pallet-revive] Fix storage deposit refunds in nested contract calls #10920
paritytech-review-bot / review-bot
failed
Jan 30, 2026 in 0s
Missing 3 reviews
The following rules have failed:
- Core developers
- Smart Contracts
Details
Details per rule:
Core developers
Missing 2 reviews
Rule explanation
Rule 'Basic' requires a given amount of reviews from users/teamsFor more info found out how the rules work in Review-bot types.
Missing reviews from teams
- core-devs
GitHub users whose approval counts
This is a list of all the GitHub users whose approval would count towards fulfilling this rule:- @gavofyork
- @koute
- @pgherveou
- @tdimitrov
- @nkpar
- @eskimor
- @pierreaubert
- @cheme
- @michalkucharczyk
- @rosarp
- @shawntabrizi
- @karolk91
- @athei
- @jsdw
- @franciscoaguirre
- @kianenigma
- @skunert
- @bkchr
- @muharem
- @EgorPopelyaev
- @dmitry-markin
- @davxy
- @bkontur
- @xermicus
- @sigurpol
- @arkpar
- @igankevich
- @Ank4n
- @eugypalu
- @ggwpez
- @gui1117
- @alindima
- @iulianbarbu
- @seadanda
- @rockbmb
- @Zebedeusz
- @serban300
- @joepetrowski
- @Overkillus
- @smiasojed
- @AndreiEres
- @acatangiu
- @AlexandruCihodaru
- @UtkarshBhardwaj007
- @pkhry
- @TarikGul
- @s0me0ne-unkn0wn
- @alexggh
- @georgepisaltu
- @sandreim
- @lexnv
- @MattHalpinParity
- @lrubasze
- @re-gius
- @zdave-parity
- @x3c41a
- @raymondkfcheung
- @csmnprschv
Smart Contracts
Missing 1 review
Rule explanation
Rule 'Basic' requires a given amount of reviews from users/teamsFor more info found out how the rules work in Review-bot types.
Missing reviews from teams
- smart-contracts
GitHub users whose approval counts
This is a list of all the GitHub users whose approval would count towards fulfilling this rule:- @pgherveou
- @athei
- @xermicus
- @TorstenStueber
- @smiasojed
- @mokita-j
- @bee344
- @elle-j
- @0xOmarA
- @soul022
- @filip-parity
- @marian-radu
Loading