-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Make domain size configurable #29
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
georgepisaltu
wants to merge
5
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
george-multiple-ring-sizes
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0f89594
Make domain size configurable
georgepisaltu 9c40945
Move to `Capacity`
georgepisaltu 3ca9d33
Single function to generate all params
georgepisaltu c7c7bfe
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into george-multiple-ring-…
georgepisaltu b4ed325
Fixes
georgepisaltu File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
File renamed without changes.
Binary file not shown.
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
Binary file not shown.
File renamed without changes.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@georgepisaltu @ggwpez
The main concern here is that
DomainSizeoutside the ring implementation doesn't make much sense(as you correctly wrote: domain size types used in ring operations).
This can instead be confusing, as downstream users may have no knowledge of polynomial commitment schemes or related concepts. These are strictly implementation details of RingProof when it is based on such schemes. From the user's perspective, the only relevant factor is the number of members they are allowed to include.
I suggest removing this trait from this generic module and replacing it with a more appropriate abstraction.
In the
GenerateVerifiabletrait, you could introduce an associated type such asCapacity, for example:(feel free to choose a better name :-) )
With this approach, the ring implementation can use the
ark-vrfhelper to derive the required PCS size(ark_vrf::ring::pcs_domain_size(ring_size)), and then select the appropriate static data based on that value.
In the ring implementation you have:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I removed the
exponentfunction and redefined the trait and type to beCapacity.