Skip to content

Update Own_reasoning_model_with_GRPO.ipynb#227

Open
kumarHemant8897 wants to merge 1 commit intopatchy631:mainfrom
kumarHemant8897:patch-1
Open

Update Own_reasoning_model_with_GRPO.ipynb#227
kumarHemant8897 wants to merge 1 commit intopatchy631:mainfrom
kumarHemant8897:patch-1

Conversation

@kumarHemant8897
Copy link

@kumarHemant8897 kumarHemant8897 commented Feb 5, 2026

I tried some change to solve this error

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected a text error in system status messages.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 5, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A user-facing text fix corrects stdout messages in a Jupyter notebook by removing a stray "X" character from "Xformers", changing it to "formers" in two message instances without affecting logic or functionality.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Text Correction
Build-reasoning-model/Own_reasoning_model_with_GRPO.ipynb
Minor fix to user-facing stdout messages: removed stray "X" character from "Xformers" in two locations (message now reads "Unsloth: Patching formers to fix some performance issues.").

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A typo fixed with care so fine,
One letter less in every line,
From "Xformers" to "formers" true,
The message now is bright and new! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Update Own_reasoning_model_with_GRPO.ipynb' is vague and generic, using only the filename without describing what was actually changed or fixed. Provide a more descriptive title that explains the specific change, such as 'Fix typo in Xformers message in Own_reasoning_model_with_GRPO.ipynb' or 'Correct stdout message text in GRPO notebook'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@Build-reasoning-model/Own_reasoning_model_with_GRPO.ipynb`:
- Line 42: Update the log/message string that currently reads "Unsloth: Patching
formers to fix some performance issues." to use the correct library name
"XFormers" (e.g. "Unsloth: Patching XFormers to fix some performance issues.")
so the user-facing output is accurate; locate the exact string "Unsloth:
Patching formers to fix some performance issues.\n" in the notebook and replace
"formers" with "XFormers".

@kumarHemant8897
Copy link
Author

i can fix this easily

@kumarHemant8897
Copy link
Author

ok i will do it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant