Merged
Conversation
Draft
ukleinek
suggested changes
Dec 16, 2025
| u_char *ucp = (u_char *)linebuf; | ||
| uint count = 52; | ||
| char linebuf[DISP_LINE_LEN]; | ||
| uint *uip = (uint *)linebuf; |
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I would replace all whitespace in this line with a single space (which matches the common style in the kernel).
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think aligning tabular things with spaces is a good practice if it improves clarity which I think it does here. This also isn't uncommon in the kernel.
jonrebm
force-pushed
the
housekeeping
branch
2 times, most recently
from
8743607 to
0241b7b
Compare
To avoid the warning: ISO C does not permit named variadic macros [-Werror=variadic-macros] This is not a functional change. Signed-off-by: Jonas Rebmann <jre@pengutronix.de>
They are nice but I don't think we're doing C23 yet and here, they aren't helping. To avoid the warning: use of an empty initializer is a C23 extension [-Werror,-Wc23-extensions] Signed-off-by: Jonas Rebmann <jre@pengutronix.de>
To avoid the warning: arithmetic on a pointer to void is a GNU extension [-Werror,-Wgnu-pointer-arith] Change some types to make more use of unsigned char pointers for byte sequences, to not have to introduce too many needless explicit casts. Signed-off-by: Jonas Rebmann <jre@pengutronix.de>
This error handling prevents re-reading the same bytes if the buffer is exhausted. This also avoids the warning: ignoring return value of ‘read’ declared with attribute ‘warn_unused_result’ [-Werror=unused-result] Signed-off-by: Jonas Rebmann <jre@pengutronix.de>
Avoids warning for -Werror=unused-variable Signed-off-by: Jonas Rebmann <jre@pengutronix.de>
It's less prosy this way Signed-off-by: Jonas Rebmann <jre@pengutronix.de>
Use consistent whitespace, identation etc. Signed-off-by: Jonas Rebmann <jre@pengutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Jonas Rebmann <jre@pengutronix.de>
Instead, write the newline explicitly after writing the answerback string. Signed-off-by: Jonas Rebmann <jre@pengutronix.de>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pr contains a series of housekeeping patches.
Dropping a single unused
int iis probably uncontroversial, removing lengthy license headers in favor of two SPDX lines and broad code reformatting maybe less so.Changes where made to now pass most of
-Wpedantic, where adaption seemed appropriate.I used uncrustify to enforce some basic code style rules, and added the uncrustify config to version control. The chosen ruleset is very soft and tries to be close to kernel style. I only enabled uncrustify rules where I found all changes it lead to in the current codebase to be beneficial in every single instance.