-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6k
util: Fixed the issues when using the same log files for different log types (#61012) #61022
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: release-8.5
Are you sure you want to change the base?
util: Fixed the issues when using the same log files for different log types (#61012) #61022
Conversation
This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by triage owners. To merge this cherry pick:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## release-8.5 #61022 +/- ##
================================================
Coverage ? 36.7787%
================================================
Files ? 1675
Lines ? 613131
Branches ? 0
================================================
Hits ? 225502
Misses ? 365486
Partials ? 22143
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
@ti-chi-bot: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Defined2014 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
This is an automated cherry-pick of #61012
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #61007
Problem Summary:
What changed and how does it work?
Check List
Tests
Side effects
Documentation
Release note
Please refer to Release Notes Language Style Guide to write a quality release note.